This argument illustrates the slippery slope fallacy as Leo Panchello was used to create a happy picture of how much hard work local business owners put in and then goes on to tell how the light rail would destroy the local business and ruin all of their hard work which brings a sad ending.
<h3>What is a fallacy?</h3>
This is known as a mistaken belief, a faulty or failed reasoning especially one based on unsound argument.
Hence, the fallacy makes the argument weak because there's no indication that a light rail would destroy a main local business in the town as when constructing a light rail, they do not tear up the street, instead, they make the light rail a part of the street
A slippery slope fallacy is a course of action that is rejected because there is little or no evidence that one insists to lead to a chain reaction resulting in an undesirable end.
Read more about<em> fallacy </em>here:
brainly.com/question/1971023
#SPJ1
Answer:
A. Make sure you cite a reliable source.
Explanation:
B. There are many unreliable materials that could be simply "printed". Being printed does not show reliability.
C. Since Wikipedia can be edited by anyone may find it untrustable to use.
D. Many .com websites can be a fake commericial website that has "fake" news.
Therefore A is the best choice for quoting a statistic. Citing from a reliable source will allow for trustability to be gained by the readers for your work.
Answer:
C. to Inform
Explanation:
INFORMATIVE pieces of literature dont include fictional aspects MOST OF THE TIME, but usually contain factual text describing, introducing or (hence the name) informing the reader
some pieces of informative literature include (not limited to) Manuals, news articles, informative essays (yes ik thats a lil obvious XD) or some research papers
some fictional pieces CAN BE informative, say an article or blog post regarding a story, where it gives further detail and fact about the story
