1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
julsineya [31]
3 years ago
9

What does "we the people" mean?

Social Studies
2 answers:
Paraphin [41]3 years ago
7 0
I believe it means we the people of the united states as a whole. Not we the white men, or we the men. It includes everyone in the united states, woman and people of different skin tones. 
Nata [24]3 years ago
7 0
"We the People" are the first three words of the preamble identifying those responsible for upholding the foundations of the American Constitution. 

Their intent, articulated by framers of the document, is laid out in the remainder of the preamble, thus: "in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity."

<span>Much debate centers around these frameworks and how they should be interpreted in changing American contexts. However this question doesn't seek to debate the Constitution. It seeks only to understand who these "We the People" the Founding Fathers implied are. </span>

<span>Some orienting questions: </span>

<span>1. Who decides who "We the People" are? </span>

2. Are "We the People":
<span>--Elected officials only? </span>
<span>--Are they only American citizens? </span>
-- Do they include First Nation natives, immigrants and/or expats concerned about America?

<span>3. What responsibilities do "We the People" have? </span>

4. Are these responsibilities divided based on role, task or station in society?

<span>At a time when emerging democracies in other countries are developing constitutions which echo that of the United States. (Which, adapted in 1787, in turn borrowed from earlier interpretations of democratic government models). </span>
<span>And while Americans struggle with deep political divides that have many feeling the country is on the brink of collapse, it is useful to take a closer look at who these "We the People" are. </span>

<span>Perhaps by considering this we can conceive more representative and constructive iterations of Who's job it is to define and deliver America's constitutional mandates.  </span>

By clarifying who these players charged with acting as "We the People" are, perhaps America can progress beyond it's polarizing partisan interpretations and catalyze more unified energies to achieve it's common ideals.

So, again: What does "We the People," mean?  i got my answer herehttps://www.ted.com/conversations/2960/what_does_the_american_phrase.html
You might be interested in
What is the BEST way to describe the relationship between American Indians and Franciscan friars living on Georgia's barrier isl
kramer
 Declining relationship cause the southern colonies was pushing native american out of there homeland.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What role did the different perceptions play in the early interactions between the European explorers and indigenous groups of t
hodyreva [135]

Answer:

Consider what interactions between the first Spanish explorers and Indigenous Peoples demonstrate about encountering the unfamiliar.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
To which cultural region did the Kiowa belong
Artist 52 [7]
<span>Western Montana into the Rocky Mountains in Colorado, indigenous people of the great plains. </span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hinduism and Buddhism both share the belief of______________________ or the idea of "do good, get good, do bad, get bad".
Kryger [21]
Belief of Karma is what they share.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain 5 major effects of Colonization on Africa.
PtichkaEL [24]

Answer:

Colonization did a number on Africa, but it wasn’t all bad (look at me trying to justify the actions of our tormentors). But joking aside colonization was responsible for one of humanity’s worst atrocities slavery... you know what, let me use a pros and cons list coz I just might end up rambling

"Cons"

Plundering of Africa’s natural resources. When European colonialists came to Africa, they came looking for raw materials for their industries (African countries started to be colonized right around the time the industrial revolution had taken root and spread all over Europe). There were also other economic and political reasons for invading Africa.

Slavery. When the colonialists came and found our great grandparents (yes it wasn’t that long ago), they found that we hadn’t developed to anything close their level. Africans were living in simple communities, we had just gone beyond hunters and gatherers and had begun adopting farming, animal keeping and participating in barter trade. We had what you would consider a rudimentary government and hierarchical leadership structures. And in terms of weaponry we had machetes, spears and shields made from dried animal hides. So when the Colonialists rolled up on our shores and saw this they thought, why trade while we can just point our guns at them and take whatever we want and kill whoever would try and stop us. Turns out it’s pretty easy to get someone to do your bidding after threatening to kill them and their whole community. So one after the other Africans were loaded onto ships, literally stockpiled to be used and sold.

Colonialists became vastly wealthy. I mean they were getting natural resources for next to nothing (okay the whips, chains, guns and boats big enough to carry as much stuff as possible weren’t free) and to top it all off free slave labour, then selling their products for a hefty profit. They were raking it in big at our expense.

Erosion of our culture. Communities were split up and others erased from existence all together. During the scramble and partition of Africa, colonialists paid no mind to the people that lived there. Clans were destroyed, communities split up and missionaries had us abandon practices that they considered backward. Communities that resisted, in some instances, had their entire villages burnt down. In West Africa, however, the French adopted the indirect method of rule, which involved assimilating Africans. This meant abandoning their language, beliefs, culture and adopting the ways of the French, but this seemed better than the alternative.

Africans were displaced from their land and concentrated into small settlements. This led to terrible living conditions and spread of diseases. White colonialist settlers accumulated huge tracts of land which after independence resulted to one of the worst land inequalities in the world, and lets not forget about apartheid.

We were dragged into a war that didn’t concern us. Hundreds of thousands of Africans were asked to “volunteer” to fight in WW2 and those that didn’t “volunteer” were forced to fight, as if they had a choice.

They forever altered our course of development. Europeans had the opportunity to go through the agrarian revolution then the industrial revolution and then proceed into the modern age. Some African communities were just beginning their agrarian revolution; we had started keeping animals, and adopted farming. We had even just started transitioning from barter trade to using our simple currencies (shells, beads, gold). I mean this was a burgeoning economy in its infancy when the Europeans decided to mess all that up.

Neo-colonialism. After colonization, the Europeans could no longer take whatever they wanted, we could now trade with Europeans. However there was a catch, we could only trade with our colonial masters. This eliminated competition (so how much you wanna bet we were getting a raw deal?). Another stipulation was that, we could only export raw materials thereby inhibiting the rate at which our local African industries could develop. Furthermore, there was to be preferential treatment to the colonialist settlers who chose to remain in the former colonies, from tax exemptions to allowing them to keep the huge tracts of land they had acquired for themselves.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How is urbanization affected by business?
    15·2 answers
  • The British colonies listed many more capital crimes in their death penalty statutes than Great Britain did in its death penalty
    12·1 answer
  • For Sam, the process of __________ took many years as he told his close friends, family, work colleagues, and others that he is
    12·1 answer
  • There were more people working in the Soviet Union than there were in the United States. What do you notice about the Gross Dome
    9·1 answer
  • In a republic, citizens select their own leaders, is that true or false?
    7·2 answers
  • In the in focus box on gender differences in responding to stress features, psychologist shelley taylor argues that men and wome
    8·1 answer
  • Sorry I’m so dumb like please help me I have a 60 in social studies I can’t afford that
    15·1 answer
  • Experience the responsibilities of citizens at the local, state, or federal levels.
    5·1 answer
  • 4. Name the federal cities in Russia.
    8·1 answer
  • _____ establishes the norms by which people evaluate their own behaviors.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!