Answer:
The correct option is;
(3) The sample of track athletes show that there is a correlation between foot size and running speed
Step-by-step explanation:
The statements are analysed as follows;
(1) Smaller foot sizes cause track athletes to run slower.
The above statement is a conclusion and it infers more information than is contained in the question statement because there are other factors such as taller athletes run faster than average sized athletes
(2) The sample of track athletes shows a causal relationship between
foot size and running speed.
The above statement is similar to the one above as it is a milder conclusion and it infers more information than is contained in the question statement
(3) The sample of track athletes shows a correlation between foot size
and running speed.
The above statement is correct as is directly supported by the data as it is a statement made based directly the data
(4) There is no correlation between foot size and running speed in
track athletes.
The above statement is not supported by the available data.
Answer:
Option B
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
A <u>rational number</u> is one that can be represented as the ratio of two whole numbers
so
-----> Is not a rational number, because √5 is not a whole number, is a irrational number
---> Is a rational number, because can be represented as the ratio of two whole numbers
therefore
√5/8 is irrational and √4/9 is rational
The first answer is correct
C(2, -2) D(-1, -2)
because the line from point a to point b is 3 units long and 3 x 4 = 12 (area) (and 12/3=4) so, the points that are exactly 4 units down from point a and point b would be the correct answer - (2, -2) and (-1, -2)
if 2 angles whose sums are 90 then the angles are Complementary Angles if the 2 angles whose sums are 180 they are Supplementary angles
Answer:
tan 45° = 1 = true
cos 30° = 1/2 = false
sin 45° = 1/3 = false
sin 90° = 0 = false
Step-by-step explanation:
