The statistical validity of frequency claims. false
Statistical validity can be described because the quantity to which drawn conclusions of a research look at may be taken into consideration correct and dependable from a statistical check. To obtain statistical validity, it's miles essential for researchers to have sufficient statistics and additionally pick the right statistical technique to analyze that records.
To gain statistical validity, researchers ought to have an adequate pattern size and select the proper statistical test to investigate the facts. shall we embrace you are analyzing a new drug for complications, and also you examine the outcomes of a experimental organization to those of a manipulate institution who failed to acquire the drug.
Concurrent validity evaluates the diploma to which a degree of a construct correlates with other simultaneous measures of that assemble. for instance, in case you administer exclusive intelligence assessments to the identical institution, there ought to be a strong, positive correlation among their rankings.
Learn more about Statistical validity here: brainly.com/question/26251731
#SPJ4
Answer:
B
Explanation:
hancock because he big brain
Consistency defines the extent to which you believe that the person being observed behaves in a similar fashion when confronted on other occasions with the same or similar situations. A consistent theory is one that does not lead to a logical contradiction in classical deductive logic. The absence of contradiction might be expressed in semantic or syntactic terms.
According to the semantic definition, a theory is consistent if it has a model, that is, if there is an interpretation under which all formulas in the theory are true. A consistency proof is a mathematical demonstration that a specific theory is consistent. The incompleteness theorems had a significant impact on Hilbert's program.
To learn more about consistency, click here.
brainly.com/question/3935025
#SPJ4
Answer:
C Inadmissible, because it is extrinsic evidence of a prior inconsistent statement on a collateral matter.
Explanation:
A defendant is on trial for robbing a liquor store. The store clerk testified that the defendant came into the store at about 11 p.m., pointed a black gun with a silver grip at him, and demanded that he give him all the money in the cash register. The clerk testified that the store was well lit and that the defendant was not wearing a mask. The defendant's attorney called the clerk's employer to testify that when the clerk gave her a report of the robbery, he told her that the defendant pointed a silver gun with a black grip at him.
How should the trial judge rule on the admissibility of this testimony?
The evidence should not be accepted by the Judge. if the the earlier statement is contrary, it is not a enough to dismiss the witness.(A) and (B) are incorrect because, The clerk may be reliable or not. The evidence she provided is not enough to prosecute the defendant. she might not be totally correct in the reporting of the situation and might leave the judge confused. (D) is not correct
