It honestly depends on what part of history you are referring to, but here are a few ways that the geography of Rome helped with its safety. Rome had an amazing navy, and the Romans designed thin, flexible boats that could maneuver around the islands and archipelagos and ram into the bigger ships of other countries. There were a few instances, during the Punic Wars, I believe, <span>where the larger armies of other countries tried to attack Rome, but got stuck on the narrow paths. They could only send a few soldiers through at a time, and the Romans easily picked them off. </span>
Jews were systematically oppressed long before the Holocaust. At first, they were isolated from the other Germans and dehumanized (forced to wear the Star of David to signify they were Jewish); from there they were segregated. They were then encouraged to leave Germany and other countries under German rule as they started to expand (their home land). Then, they were forced into ghettos. Finally, they were transported into death camps and concentration camps.
Answer:
The Boston Tea Party was a political protest that occurred on December 16, 1773, at Griffin’s Wharf in Boston, Massachusetts. American colonists, frustrated and angry at Britain for imposing “taxation without representation,” dumped 342 chests of tea, imported by the British East India Company into the harbor. The event was the first major act of defiance to British rule over the colonists. It showed Great Britain that Americans wouldn’t take taxation and tyranny sitting down, and rallied American patriots across the 13 colonies to fight for independence.
Answer:
Many machines formed in cities to serve immigrants to the u.s in the late 19th century who viewed machines as a vehicle for political enfranchisement. Machines workers helped win elections by turning out large number of voters on election days.
<u>Beliefs of both Federalists and anti-federalists:</u>
After the proposal of the new Constitution in the United States in 1787, the process of ratification became a prime subjects of argument as there arose two side to debate on it. Those who were in favour of the ratification and activation of new Constitution were termed as Federalists whereas those who were not thinking so, called the anti-federalists. Here are the prime beliefs of both the sides.
The Prime beliefs of both sides on the new Constitution's ratification
Belief of Federalists:
- The proposed Constitution was important for the survival and further development of the nation.
- A strong Government was necessary to excel after the previous failed Confederations.
Belief of Non-Federalists:
- The powers of the government, mentioned in the constitution was specifically granted and prohibited for doing more than that.
- The powers were separated into three groups rather than giving the complete authority an individual to control tyranny.
- The Constitution provided the system of checks and balances which wasn't required as all the branches were able to take care of their checks and balances.
- The Constitution provided addendum powers to the federal courts at the expense of the domestic courts which was unfair.
