Answer:
Sell the parts without any processing because the profit is higher ($20,000 vs $15,000)
Explanation:
they have two options:
- option A, sell the parts as they are and make $20,000 in profits (= $120,000 - $100,000).
- option B, further process the parts by spending $75,000 and sell them for $190,000, and make only $15,000 in profits (= $190,000 - $100,000 - $75,000).
The best option is A, to sell the parts without any processing because the profit is higher and they do not have to spend more money.
Answer:
Here answer to the first fill in the blank is money paid and answer for the second fill in the blank is overall sacrifice.
Explanation:
Here Eddie has perceived price as money paid for the purchase of his favorite beverage, he is ready to drive 30 miles for this beverage , just because he is saving a dollar on it, so from the Eddie's point view , driving 30 miles to get the beverage is worth it . But as per the most of the customers , Eddie is making an overall sacrifice by driving 30 miles to get the beverage , just because he is saving dollar on it, so from the most customers point of view , driving 30 miles is not worth it and a lot of sacrifice is being made.
Answer:
An example of a product going through scarcity is when heavy rainfall and flooding destroy crops because of which their supply is decreased, and because of this shortage their prices sky rocket or increase very fast.
Explanation:
Answer:
Dr Right of use asset 59,007.60
Cr Lease liability 59,007.60
Explanation:
Variable lease payments are generally not included as right of use asset or lease liability. Even though a 60% possibility exists that an additional $5,000 will be paid, they are not based on an index and are not disguised payments (only two exceptions to this rule).
Annual lease payments = $12,000
PV annuity factor, 6%, 6 periods = 4.9173
PV of lease payments = $12,000 x 4.9173 = $59,007.60
Answer:
Company Pea
Consolidated financial statements should be prepared to report the financial status and results of operations for:
Essone - 90%
Esstwo = 72% (90% x 80%)
Essthree = 72% (90% x 80% x 100%)
Explanation:
Company Pea is described as the holding or parent company of Company Essone. This means that Essone is Company Pea's subsidiary. In preparing consolidated financial statements to report the financial status and results of operations for Company Essone, Company Pea will consolidate 100% of Company Essone while accounting for noncontrolling interest of 10% (effectively 90%).
When Company Essone is consolidating its financial statements, it should consolidate 80% of Company Esstwo while Esstwo consolidates 100% of Company Essthree.
But since Essthree is also a subsidiary of Company Pea, Company Pea will consolidate Esstwo and Essthree's financials to the tune of 72% respectively, while consolidating 90% of Essone's.
