All categories

3 years ago

how is abigail adams's argument similar to the colonists protest over taxation without representation ?

Social Studies

1 answer:

svet-max [94.6K]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Her argument is similar because Abigail Adams believed women shouldn't be subject to laws that they are not a party in developing.

Explanation:

Abigail Adams was the wife of John Adams and she was an advocate of several causes that were progressive for her time including female education and the abolition of slavery. She believed that women should not have to participate or abide by laws where they are not represented and do not have a say. In this, her position was similar to that of the colonists more generally who rebelled against taxation without representation in the British government. In 1776 she wrote a famous letter as the Continental Congress was meeting in Philidelphia. She asked the Founding Fathers to “remember the ladies,” and she warned other women with the following remark: “Do not put such unlimited power into the hands of the husbands. Remember all men would be tyrants if they could.” Her son would also become president, John Quincy Adams.

You might be interested in

Sheila works for a manufacturer of Styrofoam trays for school lunches. Last year her son came home from school and told her that

neonofarm [45]

Answer:

The answer is e) high dissonance is tolerated because of a high reward.

Explanation:

dissonance is a state of discomfort caused by contradictory ideas or beliefs.

in this situation, sheila overlooks the deadly effects of her work on the ecosystem, because her job pays well.

4 0

3 years ago

Which World War Il leader came to power by

oee [108]

Answer:

The 1919 Treaty of Paris ended World War I, but imposed heavy penalties on ... When Adolf Hitler came to power in Germany in 1934, his government began to ... How did Wilson's Fourteen Points influence the terms of the Treaty of Versailles? .... the US is able to pull other countries into its own international conflicts, and it ...

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Ratification of the Constitution did not come easy. Two groups fought over whether or not the Constitution was a good government

netineya [11]

Here is information for both perspectives:

Federalists

I would support the federalists because they believed in a strong central government that would help to unite the states. Along with this, the creation of a new stronger federal government would help to solve the problems America faced under its first constitution, the Articles of Confederation. Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government could not tax or even raise an army. With the new US Constitution, the federal government would have these necessary powers in order to ensure safety within American society.

Anti-Federalists

I would support the Anti-Federalists because they were advocates of states rights. Along with this, the Anti-Federalists knew that a central government with too much power could very easily result in a monarchy, much like the one the United States experienced when controlled by Great Britain.

3 0

3 years ago

There will be energy crisis in future justify this statement with some reason

REY [17]

Overconsumption. Overpopulation. Poor Infrastructure. Unexplored Renewable Energy Options. Delay in Commissioning of Power Plants. Wastage of Energy. Poor Distribution System. Major Accidents and Natural Calamities.

4 0

3 years ago

Terry, a sociology major, decides that his senior project will be to explain to lower-class people how they are being exploited

zimovet [89]

Answer:conflict theorist

Explanation:

Conflict theorists believe that in a battle or competition over limited resources those who have power and wealth dominate over those who are powerless and poor.

Social stratification which put people into different classes based on their socioeconomic status has created inequality in which those with power influences even the process of decision making by the government. They make laws that the will oppress the poor.

They always work towards things that will only benefits them and suppress those who are poor.

Everyone is working towards accumulating wealth for themselves whilst the poor may even work for less whilst those with wealth keeps accumulating more.

7 0

3 years ago

how is abigail adams's argument similar to the colonists protest over taxation without representation ? ​

how is abigail adams's argument similar to the colonists protest over taxation without representation ?