Answer:
The psychologist is using the Personality Assesment.
Explanation:
In psychological field, personality assesment is a process of evaluation which objective is to determine and identiy stable enduring characteristics. Personality is defined by a group of stable characteristics a human has, and how a person relates with others and with the enviroment according to that.
Often a personality assesment can help predicte future behavior, like for instance if a person is capable or would succeed in a specific job.
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
Spartans were all about being better for Sparta. Everything they did was for Sparta. The women had children to build the army and the men were fighting. They believed Sparta was the ideal. They also hated Athens
Answer:Localized economies are less reliant on multinational corporations for their essential goods.
THE ANSWER IS A
Explanation:
Unlike robbery, picking pockets does not involve "force or fear".
<span>The focal prerequisite of robbery is that the taking be by methods for either force or fear. One regular kind of theft including force is robbing, in which the criminal snatches the casualty around the neck from the back and persuasively expels his wallet or different resources. Other regular sorts of force include hitting a casualty with the clench hands, a firearm, or a limit protest. Cutting a victim's pocket is usually not deliberated robbery as there is no usage of fear and because robbery needs more force than that required simply to eliminate the property. </span>
