Answer:
This question is incomplete, the options are missing. The options are the following:
a) They have the opportunity to reject the proposed change.
b) They will have the opportunity to know more than others about the change.
c) They will be able to convince customers the change was the right thing to do.
d) They will feel a sense of ownership of planned change and are more likely to be on board.
And the correct answer is the option D: They will feel a sense of ownership of planned change and are more likely to be on board.
Explanation:
To begin with, it will be more acceptable for an employee of a company or a member of a group to agree with a change if that person was involved in the planning of the change. That means that he will feel that he is part of the solution and therefore part of the team because his ideas were listened and maybe he contributed with something. That is why that members who participate in the planning of a change will always be more positive about the final outcome due to the fact that they were there during the process of deciding that outcome and that will make them feel integrity related to the work and to the team as well.
Answer:
Programmed decision making
Explanation:
A programmed decision is one that is done by following already laid down rules and procedures. They are Carried out using formal patterns and the goals here are both clear and specific. These rules and routines in UPS are are a good example of how programmed decisions are done. As it can be seen on every aspect of their day to day business activities.
Answer:
a. True
Explanation:
from the CAPM formula we can derive the statemeent as true.
risk free = 0.05
market rate = 0.12
premium market = (market rate - risk free) 0.07
beta(non diversifiable risk) = 0
Ke 0.05000
As the beta multiplies the difference between the market rate and risk-free rate a beta of zero will nulify the second part of the equation leaving only the risk-free rate. This means the portfolio is not expose to volatility
I would definitely be weary. If you can't answer if they're valid on your own, it's probably not!
Conducting yourself ethically and legally could have examples of: making products that are trustworthy, don't false advertise (yes, you can legally do things like endorsements and bandwagons, but you can't say "If you buy this product, you will be elected to a high office!".
