Answer: provided in the explanation segment
Step-by-step explanation:
here i will give a step by step analysis of the question;
A: Optimization Formulation
given Xij = X no. of units of product i manufactured in Plant j, where i = 1,2,3 and J = 1,2,3,4,5
Objective function: Minimize manufacturing cost (Z)
Z = 31 X11 + 29 X12 + 32X13 + 28X14 + 29 X15 + 45 X21 + 41 X22 + 46X23 + 42X24 + 43 X25 + 38 X31 + 35 X32 + 40X33
s.t
X11 + X12 + X13 + X14 + X15 = 600
X21 + X22 + X23 + X24 + X25 = 1000
X31 + X32 + X33 = 800
X11 + X21 + X31 <= 400
X12 + X22 + X32 <= 600
X13 + X23 + X33 <= 400
X14 + X24 <= 600
X15 + X25 <= 1000
Xij >= 0 for all i,j
B:
Yes, we can formulate this problem as a transportation problem because in transportation problem we need to match the supply of source to demand of destination. Here we can assume that the supply of source is nothing but the manufacturing capability of plant and demand of destination is similar to the demand of products.
cheers i hope this helps!!
Answer:
The claim that the current work teams can build room additions quicker than the time allotted for by the contract has strong statistical evidence.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have to test the hypothesis to prove the claim that the work team can build room additions quicker than the time allotted for by the contract.
The null hypothesis is that the real time used is equal to the contract time. The alternative hypothesis is that the real time is less thant the allotted for by the contract.
The significance level, as a storng evidence is needed, is α=0.01.
The estimated standard deviation is:
As the standard deviation is estimated, we use the t-statistic with (n-1)=15 degrees of freedom.
For a significance level of 0.01, right-tailed test, the critical value of t is t=2.603.
Then, we calculate the t-value for this sample:
As the t-statistic lies in the rejection region, the null hypothesis is rejected. The claim that the current work teams can build room additions quicker than the time allotted for by the contract has strong statistical evidence.
Answer: depends how far is he driving
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
FG = 31
Step-by-step explanation:
By applying mid-segment theorem in the given trapezoid,
Segment joining midpoints of the nonparallel sides is parallel and measure the half of the sum of parallel sides.
FG = ![\frac{1}{2}[UV+TW]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%5BUV%2BTW%5D)
(7x - 4) = ![\frac{1}{2}[(6x-6)+38]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%5B%286x-6%29%2B38%5D)
2(7x - 4) = 6x + 32
14x - 8 = 6x + 32
14x - 6x = 32 + 8
8x = 40
x = 5
Therefore, FG = (7x - 4)
= 7(5) - 4
= 31
For a you would just have to add all the velocity up and divide by 5. For b its -15 the ball is going down.
