Answer:
A per se violation
Explanation:
A per se violation is one that violates antitrust laws for example agreements made that violates the Sherman antitrust act. It has adverse effects on the competitiveness of a market.
Sherman antitrust act of 1980 is aimed at regulating competitiveness in a market. It prohibits anticompetitive agreements, and unilateral activities that tries to monopolize a market.
In this scenario Omega corporation and precision products, inc., are the principal suppliers of their product in their market. They make an agreement that one will focus on retailers and the other on wholesalers.
This is an attempt to monopolize the market by the two principal suppliers, and is a violation of the Sherman antitrust act.
Well a bond is a government loan where they take ur money and pay u back with interest usually low interest tho
Answer: Relevant information is information that is important or needed in order to understand the topic in a given passage. Additional information is information that is not needed or unnecessary in the paragraph (it is extra information).
Explanation:
<h3>
Answer:</h3>
C. The government
<h3>
Explanation:</h3>
Vocabulary
First, it is important to define the key terms in the question and answers.
- Planned Economy- A planned economy is an economy where the investments and capital are allocated by the government.
- Commodities - Commodities are economic goods that have real value due to their real-life usefulness (like lumber) or rarity (like gold).
How Planned Economies Work
As its name suggests, a planned economy plans the economy out and the price of goods within the markets. These plans are created by the government. This means that private businesses, consumers, and supply/demand do not control prices. Only the government can do that because the government has full control of planned economies. This is the reason that planned economies are also called command economies because the economy is commanded by the government.
Structural Realism
Explanation:
International politics is basically a struggle for power, but they don't always endorse the conventional logical view that this is a human psychology outcome. The lack of an overall authority over countries and relative power sharing in the international system refer defense rivalry and intergovernmental disputes to them.
Structural realism maintains that its theory of chaos and capability allocation (measured for the number of large competences within the international system) determine the essence of the international framework. The international system has a dynamic anarchically organising theory, which ensures that there is no hierarchical central authority.
