Web 2.0 is a simple static website without any interaction with its users is inaccurate. This statement is accurate in web 1.0 and not 2.0
Further Explanation:
Web 1.0 is considered as the read-only web and represents the 1st implementation of the WWW. It allowed users to look for information online without offering an opportunity to fully interact with its pages. You only got the opportunity to passively read the content and that was it. The pages were static and were sometimes hosted on a free web hosting service.
Web 2.0 offers an interaction with its users. It is the read-write web technology as Berners-Lee would put it and it offers interoperability to its clients. It is what we interact with so much in our day-to-day lives. Examples of web 2.0 are the Wiki, FB, Twitter, and many more. These examples shows us how web 2.0 brings people closer together with information using machines and encourages participation and sharing of information.
Web 3.0 is not commonly used and is known to may as the future web. It is what many refer to as “IOT” or the semantic web. The world is slowly trying to transition into web 3.0 with smart devices trying to connect to the internet. It is trying to alter the web that humans are familiar with into some sort of database. It the web for the foreseeable future.
Learn more about web 2.0
brainly.com/question/10313994
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
Sequential is better
Explanation:
Sequential is more organized while the more easier to make but less dependable one is random.
sequential is used for things such as date of birth, or where someone was born.
you can't do that with a random file.
I think its six. im not sure but it could be another on.
D. RAM
<span>Primary storage typically refers to random access memory (RAM), while secondary storage refers to the computer's internal hard drive. RAM,
commonly called "memory," is considered primary storage, since it
stores data that is directly accessible by the computer's CPU.</span>
