Answer:
Minimize harm because the protester might be affected by the interview.
Seek truth because the protester made a statement about a major issue.
Explanation:
The SPJ Code of Ethics is a guide that encourages journalists to take responsibility for the information they provide. It is not a strict set of rules, but it's important either way because some basic principles need to be followed in sensitive cases, such as this one.
As the protester is a minor, she needs to be protected. That's why the harm should be minimized as much as it's possible. But, at the same time, there is a possibility that the mother is not telling the truth. It is understandable that she may not want her daughter to be exposed, but the truth matters. If the protester is aware of the fact her face may be on television and wants to be heard, it should be alright to air the interview. After all, she spoke about an important issue. That's why the reporter should seek the truth and then try making the right decision.
Thus, the correct options are the last two.
We can see the author is arguing against ridgetop development, but we can also see he has made an appeal in the last paragraph.
It says, "Ridgetop development must be stopped while thoughtful, effective measures are put in place to restrict future development."
Thus, we can come to the conclusion that the best choice/answer would be:
B. Development should be stopped temporarily while restrictions are put in place for future housing developments.
It basically restates the appeal made by the author.
If you just search up on Brainly questions about social justice you should get a lot of great facts just change it into ur own words
this is really easy. i hope this helps.
All you need to do is remember the different words used in British and American English. Her is a list to help;
Note; the first words are British and the other are American.
1.
flat
apartment
2.
appetizer
starter
3.
fringe
bangs
4.
hairslide
barrette
5.
grill
broil
6.
grill
broiler
7.
sweet(s)
candy
8.
mobile phone
cell phone
9.
crisps
chips
10.
snakes and ladders
chutes and ladders
11.
wardrobe
closet
12.
biscuit
cookie, cracker
13.
candyfloss
cotton candy
14.
anticlockwise
counter clockwise
15.
cot
crib
16.
nappy
diaper
17.
chemist
drugstore
18.
aubergine
eggplant
19.
junior school, primary school
elementary school
20.
lift
elevator
21.
motorway
expressway, highway
22.
chips
French fries
23.
dustbin
garbage can
24.
petrol
gas, gasoline
25.
bonnet
hood (of a car)
26.
skipping rope
jump rope
27.
number plate
license plate
28.
off-licence
liquor store
29.
postbox
mailbox
30.
oven glove
oven mitt
31.
dummy
pacifier
32.
trousers
pants
33.
tights
pantyhose
34.
car park
parking lot
35.
parting
part (in hair)
36.
full stop
period (punctuation)
37.
public school
private school
38.
state school
public school
39.
dressing gown
robe, bathrobe
40.
shopping trolley
shopping cart
41.
pavement
sidewalk
42.
sledge
sled
43.
trainers
sneakers
44.
football
soccer
45.
hundreds and thousands
sprinkles (for ice cream)
46.
pushchair
stroller
47.
underground
subway
48.
braces
suspenders
49.
jumper
sweater
50.
takeaway
takeout (food)
51.
drawing pin
thumbtack
52.
noughts and crosses
tic-tac-toe
53.
boot
trunk (of a car)
54.
indicator
turn signal (on a car)
55.
vest
undershirt
56.
holiday
vacation
57.
waistcoat
vest
58.
flannel
washcloth
59.
postcode
zip code
60.
courgette
zucchini
Answer:
This is a very opininated answer. ACT and SAT tests are standardized tests like many others. One test should not define a persons intelligence or knowledge. First, the SAT/ACT have specificallly "book smart" problems. This means that generally just because you do good on one of these tests, doesn't mean you are a problem solver. Another problem with the accuracy for these tests is the fact that it is one test. Someone may be a horrible test taker but get all A's. These tests do not accurately measure intelligence as well as many other things.
Explanation:
