<span>It's "to reduce the power of the United States"</span>
The correct statement is that the argument over the slavery would never end.
<h3>What was the reaction of the people in the South in Scott v. Sandford case?</h3>
The people of the South were opposed to the decision made by the supreme court.
They had the the belief that the slavery would never end, despite it would spread rapidly.
Even people agreed that slavery had already spread.
Learn more about the Scott v. Sandford case here:-
brainly.com/question/12359809
#SPJ1
Jim Crow laws<span> were state and local </span>laws<span> enforcing racial segregation in the </span>Southern<span> United </span>States<span>. These </span>Jim Crow laws<span> followed the 1800–1866 Black Codes, which had previously restricted the civil rights and civil liberties of African Americans.
Hope this helps!</span>
The other allies (England, France, etc) were too war-weary and busy rebuilding their countries to really challenge them. Germany reneged on a deal regarding splitting conquered territory North and East of Germany with Russia, so Russia switched sides. Later, NATO and the UN would drive the wedge even further, Russia shut out of NATO and constantly overridden on the UN Security Council. Germany and Russia were initially allies, like-minded in their expansionist intentions. <span>It was an alliance of convenience mostly.</span>
I believe the answer is c