Answer: First of all, we will add the options.
A. Yes, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
B. Yes, because the regression equation is based on a random sample.
C. Yes, because the association between length and weight is positive.
D. No, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
E. No, because there may not be any 3-inch fish of this species in the pond.
The correct option is D.
Step-by-step explanation: It would not be appropriate to use the model to predict the weight of species that is 3 inches long because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
As we can see from the question, the model only accounts for species that are within the range of 0.75 to 1.35 inches in length, and species smaller or larger than that length have not been taken into consideration. Therefore the model can not be used to predict the weights of fishes not with the range accounted for.
Let x be the number you want to find
435= x times 25 times 3
435= 75x
X= 435/75 =5.8 (ans)
12.3 meters because of the 10 meters she jumped plus the 2.3 she went down equals 10+2.3=12.3
Answer:
cheeseburger is $3 and chips is $0.75
Step-by-step explanation:
Let price of cheeseburger be x while price of a bag of chips be y hence for the case of Nathan, we can write the equation as x+y=3.75. Similarly, for Jack, we can write it as 2x+3y=8.25
x+y=3.75 hence x=3.75-y and substituting this into the second equation we have
2x+3y=8.25
2(3.75-y)+3y=8.25
7.5-2y+3y=8.25
y=8.25-7.5=0.75
x=3.75-y=3.75-0.75=3
Therefore, price of cheeseburger is $3 and chips is $0.75
Answer:
3/5
Step-by-step explanation:
Cos(B) = adjacent/hypotenuse
Cos(B) = 48/80 = 6/10
Cos(B) = 3/5 or 0.6
