Answer:
Correct answer is D. were enslaved states
.
Explanation:
A is not correct because all of them were states since the beginning of war, including West Virginia that became state when Virginia seceded from the Union.
B is not correct as this were the border states that stayed within the Union.
C is not correct as they were actually the factor that was decisive for the outcome of the war.
D is correct as although they were part of Union, they didn't not prohibited slavery, and Lincoln was cautious with that question regarding their role.
An example of a command economy is like the Soviet Union North Korea and Cuba
The treatment of the drapery in this bodhisattva statue indicates the influence of Christian saint's cultures.
This statue depicts the bodhisattva Maitreya. Bodhisattvas are enlightened beings who postpone their personal salvation which will help all sentient beings. The bodhisattva is a great type, not a depiction of a historic person just like the Buddha. Bodhisattvas have some of the characteristics of Christian saints.
The intention of a Bodhisattva is nothing less than the liberation of all sentient beings, bringing every and every being to Buddhahood. There are also one-of-a-kind fashions of the Bodhisattva ideal provided in distinctive texts.
Those “celestial” bodhisattvas are functionally equal to buddhas of their expertise, compassion, and powers: their compassion motivates them to assist everyday beings, their expertise informs them how first-class to achieve this, and their amassed powers permit them to behave in fabulous ways.
Learn more about bodhisattvas here:
brainly.com/question/28238595
#SPJ4
Explanation:
The Islamic State (ISIS) is in sharp decline, but in its rout lie important lessons and lingering threats. This is true for the four countries of the Maghreb covered in this report, Algeria, Libya, Morocco and Tunisia, which constitute a microcosm of ISIS’ identity, trajectory and shifting fortunes to date. Those countries possess two unwanted claims to fame: as a significant pool of ISIS foreign fighters and, in the case of Libya, as the site of ISIS’ first successful territorial conquest outside of Iraq and Syria. The pool is drying up, to a point, and the caliphate’s Libyan province is no more. But many factors that enabled ISIS’s ascent persist. While explaining the reasons for ISIS’ performance in different theatres is inexact and risky science, there seems little question that ending Libya’s anarchy and fragmentation; improving states’ capacities to channel anger at elites’ predatory behaviour and provide responsive governance; treading carefully when seeking to regiment religious discourse; and improving regional and international counter-terrorism cooperation would go a long way toward ensuring that success against ISIS is more than a fleeting moment.
Its operations in the Maghreb showcase ISIS’s three principal functions: as a recruitment agency for militants willing to fight for its caliphate in Iraq and Syria; as a terrorist group mounting bloody attacks against civilians; and as a military organisation seeking to exert territorial control and governance functions. In this sense, and while ISIS does not consider the Maghreb its main arena for any of those three forms of activity, how it performed in the region, and how states reacted to its rise, tells us a lot about the organisation.
