The anti-federalists pushed for a strong state government and a comparatively weak central government. They were all for the idea of state's rights, which is why they opposed the ratification of the constitution.
One particular organization that fought for racial equality was the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) founded in 1909. For about the first 20 years of its existence, it tried to persuade Congress and other legislative bodies to enact laws that would protect African Americans from lynchings and other racist actions. Beginning in the 1930s, though, the NAACP's Legal Defense and Education Fund began to turn to the courts to try to make progress in overcoming legally sanctioned discrimination. From 1935 to 1938, the legal arm of the NAACP was headed by Charles Hamilton Houston. Houston, together with Thurgood Marshall, devised a strategy to attack Jim Crow laws by striking at them where they were perhaps weakest—in the field of education. Although Marshall played a crucial role in all of the cases listed below, Houston was the head of the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund while Murray v. Maryland and Missouri ex rel Gaines v. Canada were decided. After Houston returned to private practice in 1938, Marshall became head of the Fund and used it to argue the cases of Sweat v. Painter and McLaurin v. Oklahoma Board of Regents of Higher Education.
Answer:
social loafing
Explanation:
Social loafing: In social psychology, the term social loafing is defined as the phenomenon in which an individual is prone to give less effort on a particular task if he or she is involved in a group rather than working alone.
When an individual tends to work in a group then he or she tends to improve his or her accomplishment on a particular task by enhancing his or her talent and skills in that particular group. Social loafing gets promoted through the size of the group.
In the question above, the decrease in Jerry’s effort would be best described in terms of social loafing.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
because it's wrong and it will never be right in any absolute way
state legislature,or local legislative bodies?????????
