Wilson had a direct approach to problems while Roosevelt had an indirect approach, both of them had the same agenda regarding cartels but they had different ways of solving the problem.
Roosevelt defended natural resources putting them on federal protection and, safeguarded laborers rights.
Wilson focused mainly on the Triple Wall of Privilege, it meant that he would attack tariffs, banks, and trusts. Different from Roosevelt, Wilson didn’t distinguish good trusts from bad trusts, he was against any trust.
Answer: The correct answers are D and E
Explanation:
Answer:
On the other hand, the Americans had many intangible advantages.
The British fought a war far from home. Military orders, troops, and supplies sometimes took months to reach their destinations. The British had an extremely difficult objective. They had to persuade the Americans to give up their claims of independence. As long as the war continued, the colonists' claim continued to gain validity. The geographic vastness of the colonies proved a hindrance to the British effort. Despite occupying every major city, the British remained as at a disadvantage.
Americans had a grand cause: fighting for their rights, their independence and their liberty. This cause is much more just than waging a war to deny independence. American military and political leaders were inexperienced, but proved surprisingly competent.
The war was expensive and the British population debated its necessity. In Parliament, there were many American sympathizers. Finally, the alliance with the French gave Americans courage and a tangible threat that tipped the scales in America's favor.
SOURCE: http://www.ushistory.org/us/11a.asp
In 1887, the government made a new policy under the Dawes Act. It was designed to force assimilation by separating Native Americans from their tribal affiliations. They were then turned into farmers, and American citizens.
