Which of the following is an exception to the claim that Americans don’t vote and don’t participate when compared to other advanced democracies?
A. In some countries like Belgium and Australia voting is mandatory.
This shows the supporting detail that is used to show that Americans don’t vote and don’t participate when compared to other advanced democracies as their voting is not mandatory.
<h3>What is Voting?</h3>
This refers to the civic duty and responsibility of any citizen of a country and this is where they cast their vote for their preferred candidates in an election.
Hence, we can see that the exception to the claim that Americans don’t vote and don’t participate when compared to other advanced democracies is A. In some countries like Belgium and Australia voting is mandatory.
Based on the fact that voting is not mandatory in America, but it is in Belgium and Australia, this lends credence to the claim that Americans don’t vote and don’t participate when compared to other advanced democracies.
Read more about voting here:
brainly.com/question/13474496
#SPJ1
Answer:
The government allows citizens to own private businesses. The government also controls factories and other forms of production.
Explanation:
I learned this back a while ago.
Cultural capital. Meaning their education opportunities, intellect, way of dressing, etc.
Hope this helps, God bless!! :)
Answer: C. It required the president to inform Congress within 48 hours of the details of any troop commitment.
Context/detail:
Passed in 1973 over the veto of President Richard Nixon, the War Powers Resolution (its official name) blocks presidents from continuing the pursuance of a war without Congress's approval. In practice, however, the War Powers Act has often been sidestepped by presidents. The US Constitution leaves some tension in place between the legislative and executive branch when it comes to the country's involvement in war. Article I of the Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war. But Article II names the President the Commander-in-Chief, and presidents frequently have understood that role as containing the authority to deploy US forces without first getting congressional approval. The War Powers Act has been an ongoing point of controversy as US forces have been sent into all sorts of conflict zones in the 21st century without formal declarations of war.
