Answer:
The correct answer is: firms are unlikely to undertake investment.
Explanation:
The liquidity trap is a situation described in the Keynesian economy according to which, liquidity injections into the private banking system by the central bank do not lower interest rates or inject money into the economy and therefore do not stimulate economic growth as claimed by monetarism.
The liquidity trap occurs when people accumulate cash because they expect an adverse event, such as deflation, reduction in aggregate demand and GDP, an increase in the unemployment rate or a war. People are not buying, companies are not borrowing and banks are not lending either because they do not have enough solvency since the economic outlook is uncertain and investors do not invest because the expected returns on investments are low.
The most common characteristics of a liquidity trap are interest rates close to zero and fluctuations in the monetary base that do not translate into fluctuations in general price levels.
Complete question:
On January 1. Year 1. White Co. sold a property with a remaining useful life of 20 years to Blue Co. for $900.000. At the same time. White entered into a contract with Blue for the right to use the property (leaseback) for a period of 6 years. with annual rental payments of 580.000 that approximate the market rental payments for similar properties. On January 1. Year 1. the carrying amount of the property was 5680.000. and its fair value was 5770.000. A discount rate for the lease of 10% is used by both White and Blue. The present value factor for an ordinary annuity at 10% for 6 periods is 4.3553. The lease does not transfer the property to White at the end of the lease term and does not include a purchase option.
What amount of lease expense for the right of use of the property is recognised by White in Year 1 ?
A. $0
B. $130,000
C. $90,000
D. $220,000
Answer:
$90,000 amount of lease expense for the right of use of the property is recognised by White in Year 1
Explanation:
If the leaseback is known as an operating lease, the original transition to the buyer-lessor of the asset should be taken into account as the selling of an asset, given that all the income identification requirements have been fulfilled.
If the deal is of equal value, the lender lease is informed of the gain or loss of sale between the purchase price and the sum of the land that is held. Yet this is not a equal value trade. The property's sale price is higher than its market value. Accordingly, the income or loss on sale seems to be the difference between the equal worth and the value of the land.
Therefore, on 1 January, White records a benefit of $90,000 in revenue of $770,000 (fair value of $680,000 in carrying amounts)
Answer:
a. $12,332.2 billion
b. $3218.9 billion
c. $3093.5 billion
d. $18120.5 billion
Explanation:
a. The value of Consumption Expenditure = Sum of consumption expenditure on all goods and services
= $1,367.1 billion + $2,666 billion + $8,299.1 billion
= $12,332.2 billion
b. The value of Government Expenditure = Sum of expenditure by federal Government and State & Local government
= $1224.0 billion + $1994.9 billion
= $3218.9 billion
c. Gross Investment = Sum of investment and inventories
=Non-residential fixed investment + Residential fixed investment + Change in private inventories
= $2336.2 billion + $645.4 billion + $111.9 billion
= $3093.5 billion
d. Nominal GDP = C + I + G + (X-M)
= $12332.2 billion + $3093.5 billion + $3218.9 billion + ($2264.9 billion - $2789 billion)
= $18120.5 billion
When outflow exceeds income.
Answer:
The euro return to investing directly in euros is 180 5% 10% 360 = × ÷ , so the euros available in 180 days is EUR10,000,000 × 1.05 = EUR10,500,000. Alternatively, the EUR10,000,000 can be converted into Swiss francs at the spot rate of EUR1.1960/CHF. The Swiss francs purchased would equal EUR10,000,000 / EUR1.1960/CHF = CHF8,361,204. This amount of Swiss francs can be invested to provide a 180 4% 8% 360 = × ÷ return over the next 180 days. Hence, interest plus principal on the Swiss francs is CHF8,361,204 × 1.04 = CHF8,695,652. If we sell this amount of Swiss francs forward for euros at the 180-day forward rate of EUR1.2024/CHF, we get a euro
Subscribe to unlock
return of CHF8,695,652 ×EUR1.2024/CHF = EUR10,455,652. This is less than the return from investing directly in euros.If these were the actual market prices, you should expect investors to do covered interest arbitrages. Investors would borrow Swiss francs, which would tend to drive the CHF interest rate up; they would sell the Swiss francs for euros in the spot foreign exchange market, which would tend to lower the spot rate of EUR/CHF; they would deposit euros.
Explanation:
