Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": refuse to take some responsibility for an employee's performance if the supervisor neglected to provide regular performance feedback.
Explanation:
Performance appraisals are evaluations managers make of employees to find out if they are meeting the expectations of their duties. These tests aim to measure the efficiency of employees in their day-to-day activities at work, The appraisals have a standard method of rating workers according to their tasks and position in the firm and based on that standard feedback is provided.
<em>Supervisors are in charge of giving workers immediate suggestions on how workers could improve their operations but if they have not done that resulting in poor performance of an employee, the managers conducting the tests must accept part of the responsibility for that to happen relies on the managers.</em>
Answer:
c an idea
Explanation:
can't have a business without an idea
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in image.
Explanation
Please consider the data provided by the exercise. If you have any question please write me back. All the exercises are solved in a single sheet with the formulas indications.
Answer:
c) Adding additional project resources to the project
Explanation:
Falling behind schedule is something that needs to be avoided or dealt with promptly and systematically
Crashing is the technique to use when fast tracking has not saved enough time on the project schedule. You use crashing to save resources to the project for the least cost possible. Anyhow, crashing is expensive because more resources are added to the project.
References:
Dave. “A Step-by-Step Process of Dealing with a Project That Is Falling behind Schedule.” MyClientSpot Blog, 10 Sept. 2015
Monnappa, Avantika. “Project Management Learning Series: Fast Tracking Versus Crashing.” Simplilearn.com, Simplilearn, 27 Sept. 2019,
Answer: c. preventing a market that would generate mutually beneficial trades.
Explanation:
Zooey could argue that the policy of lunch trades is preventing a market that would generate mutually beneficial trades because if people were allowed to trade what they want for what they have with people who have what the first person wants and wants what the first person has, that can be beneficial to both of them.
It is not unlike the system of batter trading that existed before money where people traded what they had for what they wanted.
One should be very careful here though because there are multiple disadvantages involved such as kids exchanging away more nutritious food and food poisoning.