Why did the united states abandon its traditional isolationist foreign policy by becoming a part of the imperialist movement?

1 answer:

7 0

There were several different factors that caused the US to become a part of the imperialist movement, including:

1) Industrialization- The invention of technologies that allowed for the mass production of goods allowed businesses to make more of their products than ever before. Due to their increased ability to make large sums of goods, these individuals wanted the US to expand their global influence so that they may have new consumers to sell their products too.

2) Social Darwinism- This idea revolves around the concept of the "survival of the fittest." Many Americans felt that the US was a superior society that should spread its ideas and influence in order to help less civilized countries/territories.

You might be interested in

An example of u.S. Isolationism following world war i was

Masja [62]

Answer:

They reduced trade with European countries.

Explanation:

The destruction, the first world war brought to the United States changed its stance towards Europe in the following period which evident from the U.S foreign policies. They reduced trade withe European national and focused on the domestic issues. They saw the second world war as a European war and therefore took a neutral stance towards it.

5 0

2 years ago

A major religion that was founded by Mahavira in the sixth century was what

Masteriza [31]

Thanks for your question!

The answer is Jainism

Hope this helps!

4 0

2 years ago

Describe why much of Southwest Asia became part of European mandates after World War I, and explain the consequences of the mand

erica [24]

Answer: i hope this helps i think its to long but just copy what you need

A League of Nations mandate was a legal status for certain territories transferred from the control of one country to another following World War I, or the legal instruments that contained the internationally agreed-upon terms for administering the territory on behalf of the League of Nations. These were of the nature of both a treaty and a constitution, which contained minority rights clauses that provided for the rights of petition and adjudication by the International Court.[1]

The mandate system was established under Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, entered into force on 28 June 1919. With the dissolution of the League of Nations after World War II, it was stipulated at the Yalta Conference that the remaining Mandates should be placed under the trusteeship of the United Nations, subject to future discussions and formal agreements. Most of the remaining mandates of the League of Nations (with the exception of South-West Africa) thus eventually became United Nations Trust Territories.

Two governing principles formed the core of the Mandate System, being non-annexation of the territory and its administration as a “sacred trust of civilization” to develop the territory for the benefit of its native people.[2]

4 0

2 years ago

James Polk (Points : 2)

yarga [219]

The Annexation of Texas, the Mexican-American War, and the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo, 1845–1848. ... Accordingly, while the United States extended diplomatic recognition to Texas, it took no further action concerning annexation until 1844, when President John Tyler restarted negotiations with the Republic of Texas.

6 0

2 years ago

Define Francisco Pizzarro

Yanka [14]

<span>Spanish conquistador who conquered the Incas in what is now Peru and founded the city of Lima</span>

4 0

2 years ago