The correct answer is letter B.
A concurring opinion is a written statement of the decision made by the majority of the court but that also contains additional information that were also considered as basis for the ruling.
Concurring opinions aren't as useful as majority opinions because since it can state conflicting views, they can not be used as precedent to other cases.
Try A. I think that it's the closest answer because there isn't really a record of him being mean or an unfair ruler.
