Answer and Explanation:
Kant's principle of universalizability suggests that we do what we feel should be generalised or in his words universalised. I'm there words for something to be considered morally valid it should be generally satisfactory and not just apply to one person
On the other hand his principle of humanity suggests that we do those things that treat each human being as though he is the end not the means. In other words, we do not consider another human being to be something that could be used to achieve another thing but the sole purpose or end for which anything is done
The above do have contradictory applications since by generalizing a thing we could still be using a human being and not making him the end in this respect. I believe the best of the two principles however is the humanity principle since by holding this principle dear every human being would treat each other better and the universalizability principle would still apply.
Explanation:
Contamination can have undesirable consequences in real experiments, some of them are related to the feelings that may arise in the research participants, the contamination bias reduces the differences between the research groups, and can cause a comparison between the treatments of each different group, the which can generate conflicts and rivalries on the part of groups that consider themselves to be inferior to others. These contamination-related problems can significantly interfere with the research results.
Answer:
The exports of San Juan, Puerto Rico are chemicals, electronics, clothing, canned tuna, rum, beverages, and the last one is medical equipment.
The imports are Gasoline, other fuels, Passenger vehicles, Medical instruments, and Sulfonamides
Answer:
mediator
Explanation:
Dr Samuels found that teasing plays the role of a mediator. In this context, a mediator means a facilitator of a behavior. Teasing facilitated delinquent behaviors in children with unusual names
