Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

8

Assume Mrs. Kinsley has filed a suit against Kitchen Essential Products Inc. for the injuries that she sustained under the theor

y of strict product liability. Can Mrs. Kinsley prevail in a cause of action against Kitchen Essential Products Inc. under strict product liability?

1 answer:

Serjik [45]3 years ago

3 0

a=c+4;=8

Explanation:

i think that's the answer

You might be interested in

Any driver under 21 who is found to have a BAL of .05 or higher will

atroni [7]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Welcome

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

7. If during the last 100 feet of approaching a railroad crossing, you cannot see the track for at least 400 feet in both direct

VikaD [51]

Answer:

? My guess is D.10

Explanation:

Dont take it for 100% fact but if you were on a railroad crossing and you couldnt see the track for 400 feet either way you would want to careful and watch the tracks and cross slowly.

8 0

3 years ago

Most crimes are those of

V125BC [204]

Most crimes are those of C. omission meaning one must make a truly voluntary act to be found guilty.

<h3>What is a Crime?</h3>

This refers to the act or action of engaging in an activity that is prohibited and is outlawed by the laws of a place.

Hence, we can see that based on the fact that most crimes are crimes of omission, which means that because a person failed to perform his legal duty, then one must make a truly voluntary act to be found guilty.

Read more about crimes of omission here:
brainly.com/question/27230467

6 0

3 years ago

Keeping in mind the constitutional war powers of Congress and the President, how would you assess the

Goryan [66]

Answer:

"Opponents of the War Powers Resolution have traditionally claimed that clause 11 confers upon Congress only a narrow piece of war power. Defenders of the Resolution have argued in contrast that the Resolution constitutes an exercise of congressional authority under the clause. This last contention pokes at the truth without quite striking it. The War Powers Resolution is not constitutional as an exercise of the war power. It is constitutional because it defines the war power. The War Powers Resolution is nothing more or less than a congressional definition of the word "war" in article I. A definition of this kind coupled with a reasonable enforcement mechanism is well within the power of Congress under a proper understanding of the constitutional system of checks and balances. The definition does not intrude on any presidential prerogative. The mechanisms chosen by Congress to enforce the provisions of the Resolution were reasonable in 1973 and, although matters have been complicated by the United States Supreme Court's decision late last Term in Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha, those mechanisms remain reasonable today."

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

James is a taxpayer that files married filing separately. he had a tax liability of $6,700 in the previous tax year. his agi is

omeli [17]

For James to avoid an underpayment penalty in 2020, he needs to pay <u>$23,912.50</u>.

<h3>What is an underpayment penalty?</h3>

An underpayment penalty is the IRS fine levied on taxpayers who do not pay enough of their estimated tax liability.

According to the IRS rules, to avoid an underpayment penalty, James must pay either 100% of last year's tax or 90% for 2020.

<h3>Data and Calculations:</h3>

Tax liability from 2019 = $6,700

AGI for the current tax year = $85,000

Taxable income = $76,500 (assumed to be 90% of AGI)

Tax rate = 25%

Tax liability for 2020 = $19,125 ($76,500 x 25%)

Minimum tax to pay to avoid underpayment penalty = $23, 912.50 ($6,700 + $19,125 x 90%)

Thus, for James to avoid an underpayment penalty in 2020, he needs to pay <u>$23,912.50</u>.

Learn more about underpayment penalties at brainly.com/question/14328731

#SPJ1

3 0

2 years ago