Answer:
Multinational enterprises (MNEs)
Relationship Change as the MNE moves from Globalization 2.0 to Globalization 3.0 operations:
This move means that Indian and Chinese companies would be competing with my local small firm. The MNE may be looking for cheaper prices for my company's products and services, which the Indian and Chinese companies would more efficiently supply it. My firm may be on the precipice of liquidating if this MNE is our major customer. My firm must move fast to become more competitive by differentiating our products and services with better quality and perhaps reduced production costs, to enable it compete more favorably with the Indian and Chinese competitors. Otherwise, we may regard the relationship as nearing its end and prepare for other opportunities with other companies.
Explanation:
Globalization reduces national boundaries by integrating national economies into a globalized economy, thus enabling companies to compete globally for financial resources, goods, and services. When Globalization 1.0 happened, countries were globalized and the world became a global village. When Globalization 2.0 from which the G7 profited largely, companies were globalized. With the current Globalization 3.0, individuals are being globalized, and the highest beneficiaries are Indian and Chinese nationals who appear better prepared to take on the world, garner most of the important resources to themselves, and call the shots from the boardrooms. An example is Microsoft's current CEO, Satya Nadella, who is an Indian-American.
The capital adequacy ratio (CAR) calculates a bank's available capital as a proportion of its risk-weighted credit exposures. The capital adequacy ratio, is commonly known as the capital-to-risk weighted assets ratio (CRAR). A leverage ratio is any of a number of financial metrics that examine the amount of capital that is borrowed (loans).
Learn more about capital adequacy Ratio (CAR ) And leverage Ratio (LR) here:
brainly.com/question/16993640
#SPJ4
Answer:
$64,000
Explanation:
Calculation to determine the cost of goods sold using the average cost method
First step is to calculate the Average cost
Average cost = [(200 × $140) + (400 × $160) + (100 × $200)] ÷ 700 units
Average cost= $160
Now let calculate the Cost of goods sold
Cost of goods sold = $160 × 400 units
Cost of goods sold = $64,000
Therefore the cost of goods sold using the average cost method will be $64,000
The correct answer is monopolistic competition
Answer:
Rock Group and Costume Shop
Under this arrangement the rock group is the
d. assignor.
Explanation:
The rock group, as the assignor, is the entity that transfers its property rights or its powers to payment to Costume Shop. The Costume Shop is the assignee because it is the entity to which property rights or powers to payment of the rock group are transferred. Under the performance contract, the rock group can also be described as the delegator while the Costume Shop is the delegatee. However, under payment terms, the rock is the assignor while the Costume Shop is the assignee.
