1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
natita [175]
3 years ago
15

Which three countries are members of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)? Canada

History
2 answers:
Lostsunrise [7]3 years ago
3 0

NAFTA or the North American Free Trade Agreement are composed of the three countries namely the United States, Mexico, and Canada. It is the largest free trade agreement in the world. These three countries' gross domestic product (GDP) is equal to or more than $20 trillion.

Sonbull [250]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answers are:

- Canada;

- Mexico;

- United States'

Th North American Free Trade Agreement, or better known as NAFTA, is a trade agreement between the three North American countries of Mexico, the United States of America, and Canada. This agreement has been made between them is order to be able to have free trade between their big economies, as it is in the best interest for all three sides. All three countries have something that one of them doesn't, but needs it and is in high demand, and this agreement makes it possible that the prices are lower for both, exports and imports, thus making the products more available for the consumers.

You might be interested in
List three things you notice about these images related to Buddhism that interest you.
Alona [7]

Answer:

it seems as if buddhism was spread all over Asia. Only men are present and they all have bald heads and this might represent purity as their bodies appear to be hairless. The buddha statue shows a buddha with something on his head. That is striking as they are usually seen as bald headed men in cloth rather than with jewellery or hair adorning their bodies.

My predictions: Buddism represents purity of ones mind body and soul. only men can be a part of buddhism

Question: What is the central belief of buddhism?

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was not one of the Nixon Administration's Vietnam War policies? all-volunteer army de-escalation military
Ksenya-84 [330]
Aid to Viet Cong.

We were fighting against the Viet Cong, not aiding them.
5 0
3 years ago
What war saw united Athens and Sparta against an Asian foe
jeka57 [31]
Persian war first war

8 0
3 years ago
Manifest destiny was mainly achieved by
Alex787 [66]

Answer:

C. The creation of new government agencies

3 0
3 years ago
Why did the Preaching for Politics happen?
lord [1]

ON NOVEMBER 13, 2016, THE Sunday after the election of Donald Trump, I stepped into the pulpit of St. Barnabas Memorial Church in Falmouth, Massachusetts, to preach. I do this two or three times a month, but it’s fair to say I approached my homiletical responsibility differently that Sunday. The months since November 2016 have buffeted us with report after report of scandal, violence, injustice, and deceit, so it may be worth remembering just what those five days between Tuesday, November 8, and Sunday, November 13, looked and felt like in the United States. At DeWitt Junior High, in my home state of Michigan, white students formed a wall outside the school and barred entry to any student of color. The white students said they were making America great again. A toy doll with brown skin had string tied around its neck and was hanged inside an elevator at Canisius College in Buffalo, New York. At Wellesley College in Massachusetts, students of color were spat upon while entering and exiting the multicultural student center. At San Diego State, a Muslim student was assaulted and her hijab torn from her head. There are many other examples.


These things saddened and frightened me, and as I climbed to the pulpit, I knew I must address them. The question, of course, was not if I should preach about politics, but how, and that question persists months later. Since early 2016 we have been told over and again by pundits and historians alike that our (continuing, unending) political moment is one of absolute singularity, one entirely without precedent. No one has ever campaigned like this, governed like this, spoken like this, lied like this, boasted like this, tweeted like this. So how should one preach in response to all this? What should political preaching look like in the age of Donald Trump? That is one question. But I want to ask a different, related, and perhaps more important one. In the age of Donald Trump, I do not want to ask how one should preach about politics. I want to ask: what will the politics of preaching itself be?

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The atomic bombing of Hiroshima killed less Japanese civilians than the fire-bombing of Tokyo a few weeks earlier. Why was there
    10·1 answer
  • What created conflict between colonists and the Delaware Indians in Pennsylvania in 1737?
    6·2 answers
  • In Sparta, how were helots usually enslaved? The Spartan babies that were deemed weak were raised to be slaves. Spartans enslave
    9·1 answer
  • Where did African Americans in the 1920s face the most discrimination? A. In the Caribbean, where they were recent immigrantsB.
    13·2 answers
  • During the _____ process, pollutants are left behind because they are heavier than the water itself.
    8·1 answer
  • In 2009, the us had a population of about 307 million people. if there were 14 births and 8 deaths per 1000 people, what was the
    8·1 answer
  • During the Spanish-American War, the U.S. Navy destroyed the Spanish fleet in Manila
    8·1 answer
  • Which phrase best complete the diagram
    11·1 answer
  • Write a four hundred word essay telling the significance the Battle of Saratoga had on the Continental Army
    9·2 answers
  • Free points!!! But you have to tell me your favorite marvel character??? And if you like to roleplay??? Mark brainest if you ans
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!