Oral evidence to ""fill in the gaps"" of a contract with incomplete terms can be introduced at a trial. The statement is true .
At a trial, oral testimony can be used to "fill in the gaps" of a contract with omitted clauses. Any agreement that is not in writing is null and void according to the Statute of Frauds. Ordinarily, an oral agreement that is supposed to be in paper is void.
Oral evidence can be shown by a witness who was present when they occurred or by a recording of the agreement at the time it occurred. This could be the proof that a person offers to support their claim. Oral agreements are dangerous and unsafe since one never knows when someone will retract their own claims.
To learn more about oral evidence here
brainly.com/question/3520914
#SPJ4
Answer:
Perceptual set
Explanation:
A perceptual set has to do with how an individual is predisposed to perceive things in a unique way. Sometimes when an object or circumstance is presented to several people, they most likely only notice certain attributes of the object or circumstance while ignoring some other attributes, this most times as a result of how they perceive things. A perceptual set can also be referred to as how a person interprets certain things based on the person's previous experiences. In addition, in the face of new information, one's culture, expectations, experiences can implicate one's ability to see certain things while ignoring others.
Answer:
Kantian Ethics
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
- Egoism
- Act utility
- Rule utility
- Kantian Ethics
In this example, Greg is employing Kantian ethics to deal with this question. Kantian ethics are an example of a deontological moral theory. This means that an act is wrong or right not based on the consequence of the act, but based on whether this act fulfills our duty or not. In this example, Greg argues that he "must try." This is the duty he has to fulfill. Therefore, the way in which he thinks about morality is based on duties, and whether these apply to him or not.
Answer: Small states are easier to manage politically, while large states are more likely to be corrupt.
Explanation:
During the Constitutional Convention of 1787, large states claimed to deserve more of a voice due to their larger populations, so they demanded congressional representation to be based on population.
Smaller states, fearing being ignored if that happened, wanted equal representation.
Roger Sherman, based on the idea of small states being easier to be handle politically, and large states being more prone to corruption, proposed the Connecticut Compromise with Oliver Ellsworth, which granted equal representation in the Senate and representation by population in the House, in a bicameral system that provided a balance of power.
uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
