What is Congressional Reconstruction?

Civil Rights and the Vietnam War Test answers

ratelena [41]

Answer: Segregation represents the highest form of discrimination. They differed in the methods of their struggle. The Kennedy administration reacted rationally. A countermeasure of the United States accompanied every movement of the Soviet Union. The Soviets were the first to conquer Earth's orbit.

Explanation:

Segregation is one of the highest forms of human rights abuses. There are multiple forms of discrimination, but racial segregation is the most prevalent. It was exceptionally actualized during the 19th and 20th centuries, and unfortunately, it is still present today to some extent. In addition to racial segregation, there is also religious segregation, ethnic segregation.

Malcolm X and Martin Luther King were fighters and human rights activists. However, they differed in the methods they exercised to exercise their rights. Martin Luther King propagated non-violence and passive resistance to improve the attitude of the African American population. Malcolm X, on the other hand, was more radical in his pursuit of rights. He promoted the violent rejection of white America, Christian values, and emphasized the supremacy of black over the white race.

Malcolm X's death was met with disbelief. Thousands of people mourned the black, nationalist leader. However, some spoke differently. Some US media have called him a pimp, a massive drug addict, and a person who loved guns. The assassination of Martin Luther King resulted in an escalation (to a greater or lesser extent) of violence. Violent protests were a response to his murder. A vast number of people were angry but also sad about killing. There are some testimonies from the south of the state that we're looking forward to King's murder.

It can be pointed out that President Kennedy and his administration reacted wisely and cautiously after American spy planes spotted Soviet warheads in Cuba. The administration did not immediately make known to the Soviets and Cubans that they were aware of the situation. After consulting with their people, they decided to make a naval blockade around Cuba. We can say that the Kennedy administration reacted reasonably and calmly.

The Soviets place nuclear heads in Cuba. Americans are detecting the same and are preparing a naval blockade of Cuba. America informs the public about the situation and asks the Soviet Union to remove its weapons. The Soviets remove their weapons but ask America not to invade Cuba. America agrees to the Soviet Union's request, plus eliminating nuclear weapons from Turkey. The crisis is ending.

During the Cold War, there was a tightening of arms and technological superiority between the United States and the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was the first to send the uncrewed spacecraft Sputnik 1 into orbit. It happened in October 1957. After this event, the Soviets went one step further, submitting the first man into Earth's orbit. It was Soviet astronaut Yuri Gagarin. It happened in 1961, and his craft made one full circle around the country. The flight was executed successfully, and Gagarin was celebrated as a hero.

4 0

3 years ago

Identify two reasons some Indians wanted independence from Great Britain in the early 1900s.

N76 [4]

Answer:

1. Freedom from Unpayable Taxes. 2. Freedom from British Domination In their Land

Explanation:

In the early 1900s, Indians wanted Independence from the British because they craved for Freedom of Speech. Freedom from Unpayable Taxes. Freedom from British Domination In their Land.

Nationalism was intensified after 1918 for two main reasons:

1. There was a great degree of satisfaction with the reforms by the educated Indian nationals.

2. Many Brits were still dominant in India.

Woodrow Wilson had made Indians aware of his belief in national self-determination. He believed that Indians had a right to govern themselves and this undermined the basic idea of the colonialist Brits.

7 0

3 years ago

In the myth of the "Self-Made Man", what did business tycoons claim their success was simply the result of? What was the actual

True [87]

Answer:

The Self-Made Myth exposes the false claim that business success is the result of heroic individual effort with little or no outside help. Brian Miller and Mike Lapham bust the myth and present profiles of business leaders who recognize the public investments and supports that made their success possible—including Warren Buffett, Ben Cohen of Ben and Jerry’s, New Belgium Brewing CEO Kim Jordan, and others. The book also thoroughly demolishes the claims of supposedly self-made individuals such as Donald Trump and Ross Perot. How we view the creation of wealth and individual success is critical because it shapes our choices on taxes, regulation, public investments in schools and infrastructure, CEO pay, and more. It takes a village to raise a business—it’s time to recognize that fact.

This book challenges a central myth that underlies today’s antigovernment rhetoric: that an individual’s success is the result of gumption and hard work alone. Miller and Lapham clearly show that personal success is closely tied to the supports society provides.

Explanation:

it’s worth mentioning briefly an additional impact that the self-made myth has on our public debates—that of people voting their aspirations. Because the rags-to-riches myth persists, many Americans hold on to the belief, however unlikely, that they too may one day become wealthy. This has at times led to people’s voting their aspirations rather than their reality. As Michael Moore noted in 2003:

After fleecing the American public and destroying the American Dream for most working people, how is it that, instead of being drawn and quartered and hung at dawn at the city gates, the rich got a big wet kiss from Congress in the form of a record tax break, and no one says a word? How can that be? I think it’s because we’re still addicted to the Horatio Alger fantasy drug. Despite all the damage and all the evidence to the contrary, the average American still wants to hang on to this belief that maybe, just maybe, he or she (mostly he) just might make it big after all.35

It is essential that we find a more honest and complete narrative of wealth creation. In chapter 2, we expose the fallacy of the self-made myth by examining the stories of individuals often lifted up as successes in our public dialogues. In examining their stories, we come to better understand that even their business success includes contributions from society, from government, from other individuals, and even luck.

Beyond the moralizing ridiculed by Twain, this individual success myth overlooked a number of key social and environmental factors. The emergence of a clear geography of opportunity showed that there was something about the place where one lived that contributed to one’s success. No matter what personal qualities someone had, if you lived in Appalachia or the South, your chances of ascending the ladder to great wealth were slim. Those who achieved great wealth were almost invariably from the bustling industrial cities of the Northeast. By one estimate, three out of four millionaires in the nineteenth century were from New England, New York, or Pennsylvania.7

Another unique external factor was the opportunity that existed at that time, thanks to expanding frontiers and seemingly unlimited natural resources. The United States was conquering and expropriating land from native people and distributing it to railroads, White homesteaders, and land barons. Most of the major Gilded Age fortunes were tied to cornering a market and exploiting natural resources such as minerals, oil, and timber. Even P. T. Barnum, the celebrated purveyor of individual success aphorisms, had to admit in Art of Money Getting that “in the United States, where we have more land than people, it is not at all difficult for persons in good health to make money.”8

He might have added that it also helped to be male, to be free rather than a slave, and to be White. While free Blacks had some rights in the North, they had little opportunity to achieve the rags-to-riches dream because of both informal and legal discrimination. Even after the Civil War, Blacks, Asians, and others were largely excluded from governmental programs like the Homestead Act that distributed an astounding 10 percent of all US lands—270 million acres—to 1.6 million primarily White homesteaders.9

5 0

2 years ago

How did the Columbian Exchange impact the people of Africa?

Whitepunk [10]

Answer:The introduction of new crops and the decimation of the native population in the New World led to the capture and enslavement of many African people.

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

What did the rejection of the league of nations the higher tariffs imposed by the fordney mccumber act and the emergency quota a

givi [52]

For the answer to the question above, t<span>he rejection of the league of nations, the higher tariffs imposed by the or deny-cucumber act and the emergency quota act all point to America's desire of isolationism during the early 1920's.

</span>The American foreign policy of Isolationism in the 1920's<span> was a diplomatic and economic doctrine that aimed at self-advancement to make the United States economically self-reliant and retaining peace with other nations.</span>

7 0

3 years ago