Answer:
The treaties at the End of World War I completely changed the map of the world and had a huge impact on the subsequent events.
Explanation:
The treaty of Versailles was signed in June 1919 and consisted of the great powers of the world who had fought in the war. The Axis were made to give reparations and had to either free large parts of lands or give them to the Allies.
The Ottoman Empire was allied with Germany and both of them lost the power. The Ottoman Empire was eventually broken up which had an impact on Europe, Asia and the Middle East.
Greece, Armenia, Bulgaria among other countries gained Independence. The Middle East completely changed with the formation of Iraq and eventually Saudi Arabia with a British Mandate for Palestine.
In Europe, Germany also had to give up a lot of land. The Mighty Austro-Hungarian Empire also ceased to exist.
The answer to the first question is: the king of India, he never conquered India. The answer to the second: Phalanxes. The phalanxes were based on the usage of long spears, that would stop the enemy advancing.
Answer:
encompasses military activity within Afghanistan after 1992 but apart from the Afghanistan War (2001–14), a U.S.-led invasion launched in response to the September 11 attacks on the United States in 2001.
Explanation:
be safe and have a day
∵∴∵∴∵∴∵∴∵
⊕ΘΞΠΤ⊕
∵∴∵∴∵∴∵∴∵
Answer: “Birth of a Nation”—D. W. Griffith’s disgustingly racist yet titanically original 1915 feature—back to the fore. The movie, set mainly in a South Carolina town before and after the Civil War, depicts slavery in a halcyon light, presents blacks as good for little but subservient labor, and shows them, during Reconstruction, to have been goaded by the Radical Republicans into asserting an abusive dominion over Southern whites. It depicts freedmen as interested, above all, in intermarriage, indulging in legally sanctioned excess and vengeful violence mainly to coerce white women into sexual relations. It shows Southern whites forming the Ku Klux Klan to defend themselves against such abominations and to spur the “Aryan” cause overall. The movie asserts that the white-sheet-clad death squad served justice summarily and that, by denying blacks the right to vote and keeping them generally apart and subordinate, it restored order and civilization to the South.
“Birth of a Nation,” which runs more than three hours, was sold as a sensation and became one; it was shown at gala screenings, with expensive tickets. It was also the subject of protest by civil-rights organizations and critiques by clergymen and editorialists, and for good reason: “Birth of a Nation” proved horrifically effective at sparking violence against blacks in many cities. Given these circumstances, it’s hard to understand why Griffith’s film merits anything but a place in the dustbin of history, as an abomination worthy solely of autopsy in the study of social and aesthetic pathology.
