1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Julli [10]
3 years ago
8

The doctrine of nullification led to the philosophy of "manifest destiny." Is this True of False?

History
2 answers:
ohaa [14]3 years ago
6 0
It is false. The doctrine of nullification most certainly did not lead to the philosophy of manifest destiny.
Rasek [7]3 years ago
5 0

I don't think that's true because nullification and manifest destiny are two completely different topics.

 Nullification states that a state has the right to deem any federal law unconstitutional and nullify it or declare it invalid and manifest destiny is the belief that all Americans were destined to expand throughout the continent.

You might be interested in
Where were most of the Japanese<br> Internment Camps
Ivenika [448]
The american west, california primarily
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Acellus
oksian1 [2.3K]

Answer:

B. Natives

Explanation:

The Treaty of Alliance with France was signed on February 6, 1778, creating a military alliance between the United States and France against Great Britain.

4 0
2 years ago
What was an effect of northern African American protests against slavery?
Degger [83]
One of the effects was the North asking the South to free the slaves. However, the south did not want to, and so it became the reason for the North to get ready for the Civil War.

hope this helps
3 0
3 years ago
why is it in the presidents best interest to nominate several federal judges favored be most senators?
slamgirl [31]
During the summer of 1787, the delegates to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia established equal representation in the Senate and proportional representation in the House of Representatives.  Called the “Great Compromise” or the “Connecticut Compromise,” the unique plan for congressional representation resolved the most controversial aspect of the drafting of the Constitution.  

In the weeks before the Constitution’s framers agreed to the compromise, the delegates from the states with large populations argued that each state’s representation in the Senate should correspond to the size of the state.  Large-state delegates promoted James Madison’s Virginia Plan, the document that was the basis for several of the clauses in the Constitution.  Under this plan, the Senate and the House would base their membership on the same proportional “right of suffrage.”   That is, the number of senators in each state would be determined by its population of free citizens and slaves.  Large states, then, stood to gain the most seats in the Senate.  As justification for this advantage, delegates noted that their states contributed more of the nation’s  financial and defensive resources than small states, and therefore, required a greater say in government.

Small-state delegates hoped to protect states’ rights within a confederate system of government. Fearing the effects of majority rule, they demanded equal representation in Congress, as was practiced under the Articles of Confederation and assumed in William Paterson’s New Jersey Plan.  In fact, some framers threatened to withdraw from the convention if a proportional representation measure passed.  

Other delegates sought a compromise between large-state and small-state interests.  As early as 1776, Connecticut’s Roger Sherman had suggested that Congress represent the people as well as the states.  During the 1787 convention, Sherman proposed that House representation be based on the population, while in the Senate, the states would be equally represented.  Benjamin Franklin agreed that each state should have an equal vote in the Senate except in matters concerning money.  The convention’s grand committee reported his motion, with some modifications, to the delegates early in July.  Madison led the debates against Franklin’s measure, believing it an injustice to the majority of Americans, while some small-state delegates were reluctant even to support proportional representation in the House.  On July 16, delegates narrowly adopted the mixed representation plan giving states equal votes in the Senate within a federal system of government.

Once delegates established equal representation in the Senate, they needed to determine how many senators would represent each state.  State constitutions offered some guidance.  Several states designated one senator per county or district, while in Delaware there were three senators for each of the three counties.  Convention delegates did not refer to the state precedents in debate, however.  Instead, they seemed to take a common-sense approach in deciding the number of senators.

According to constitutional commentator Joseph Story (1779-1845), few, if any, delegates considered one senator per state sufficient representation.   Lone senators might leave their state unrepresented in times of illness or absence, and would have no colleague to consult with on state issues.  Additional senators, moreover, would increase the size of the Senate, making it a more knowledgeable body, and better able to counter the influence of the House.   On the other hand, a very large Senate would soon lose its distinctive membership and purpose, and actually decrease its ability to check the lower house or to allow senators to take personal responsibility for their actions.

Given these considerations, delegates had a limited choice regarding the number of senators.  During the convention, they briefly discussed the advantages of two seats versus three.   Gouverneur Morris stated that three senators per state were necessary to form an acceptable quorum, while other delegates thought a third senator would be too costly.  On July 23, delegates filled in the blank in the proposal offered by Morris and Rufus King: “That the representation in the second branch consist of _____ members from each State, who shall vote per capita.” Only Pennsylvania  voted in favor of three senators.  When the question turned to two, Maryland alone voted against the measure, not because of the number, but because Martin disagreed with per capita voting, which gave each senator, rather than each state, one vote.

6 0
3 years ago
Can someone help me understand the question, Will MARK AS BRAINLIEST 50 POINTS.
borishaifa [10]

So, a good answer to this would look at the following:

Economy:

The big difference between the North and South was the divide between industrial and agrarian. The Southern economy was heavily based on farming tobacco and cotton and used slave labor. The Northern economy developed into an industrial economy.

Social Structure:

Again, the Northern live was based around industrial bases located in urban centers. So, Northern social structures were based on merchant class structures while the Southern structure was based on who owned the largest plantation.

Daily Life:

Go into city v. country

Social Attitudes:

This is where the divide on slavery emerged. Religious differences between Unitarianism and Episcopal/Baptist faith fueled this

The concluding paragraph:

The question is asking you to take what you talked about above, particular in regards to geography, social structure, and daily life and apply it to the West. Does the West at the time sound more like New England's industrial urban centers or the South's spread out plantations in need of cheap workers?


7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the name given to American colonists who sided with grate Britain during the American revolution
    12·1 answer
  • How was England different than the absolute monarchies of both France and Russia during this time period?
    5·1 answer
  • Who had the first presidential library?
    9·1 answer
  • How did the civil war influence the beginning of american realism
    13·1 answer
  • In what order did these events occur in the life of the Buddha?
    9·2 answers
  • The Central Powers included which countries?
    5·2 answers
  • Why were Africans enslaved in brought to the Americas
    15·1 answer
  • The soviet unicon was a which nation​
    5·2 answers
  • Sir Thomas More was executed because he
    11·1 answer
  • CONVINCE ME OTHERWISE.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!