All categories

2 years ago

The extra expense incurred by a business to stay in operation following a fire is an example of a(n)

Business

1 answer:

polet [3.4K]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

indirect loss

Explanation:

Indirect loss is the loss, which occurs due to some unavoidable exceptional circumstances. These situations are not generally expected and usually do not comprise the day to day activity.

In the given case also, a fire occurs which destroy the operations, now in order to re-function the operations of the business the company needs to expense on some activities, as the premises require transformation.

Further with these expenses as re installation, repairs and maintenance the company will start operating again, but since they come from an unexpected situation, it was an expense on indirect loss.

You might be interested in

When a firm initiates a price decrease, it must seriously consider how competitors will react. although not all competitors are

Anika [276]

The firm initiates a price decrease, their projection on the competitors' reaction is they will also decrease their price to level with them. Starting a price decrease will affect the whole market of like products. Also, another angle that they considered is they will be reprimanded by their regulatory board.

3 0

3 years ago

Hamilton company’s 8 percent coupon rate, quarterly payment, $1,000 par value bond, which matures in 20 years, currently sells a

aliya0001 [1]

The correct answer is the firm's component cost of debt for purposes of calculating the wacc is 7.32%.

4 0

3 years ago

If Tex's Manufacturing Company purchases the component externally, $20,000 of the fixed costs can be avoided. At what external p

Delvig [45]

Answer:

$210,000

Explanation:

The computation of the external price is shown below

Making cost = buying cost

$120,000 + $25,000 + $45,000 + $30,000) = external price + Unavoidable fixed cost (30,000-20,000)

$220,000 = External price + $10,000

So,

External price = 210,000

Hence, the same is to be considered

Therefore the external price is $210,000

5 0

3 years ago

Aspen Company estimates its manufacturing overhead to be $515,000 and its direct labor costs to be $515,000 for year 2. Aspen wo

Step2247 [10]

Answer:

COGS 3807 debit

FG 7896 debit

WIP 2397 debit

Factory Overhead 14,100 credit

--to record the underapplication of overhead--

Explanation:

overhead rate:

$\frac{Cost\: Of \:Manufacturing \:Overhead}{Cost \:Driver}= Overhead \:Rate$

$515,000 overhead / 515,000 labor cost = $1

each labor cost generates a dollar of overhead.

221,400 x 1 = 221,400 overhead in COGS

459,200 x 1 = 459,200 overhead in Finished Goods

139,400 x 1 = 139,400 overhead in WIP inventory

Total applied 820,000

Actual 805,900

Underapplied 14,100

Now we weight each concept and determiante the portion underapplocated in each concept

$\left[\begin{array}{cccc}Item&Value&Weight&Allocated\\COGS&221400&0.27&3807\\FG&459200&0.56&7896\\WIP&139400&0.17&2397\\&&&\\Total&820000&1&14100\\\end{array}\right]$

4 0

3 years ago

A corporation makes an investment of $20,000 that will provide the following cash flows after the corresponding amounts of time:

s344n2d4d5 [400]

A) The company should not invest in the provided project due to the negative NPV of the project.

B) The NPV of the project comes out to be (286).

NPV is an abbreviated form of Net present value and computed by deducting the cash outflows from cash inflows at the present value.

Given values:

Cash flow of year 1: $10,000

Cash flow of year 2: $10,000

Cash flow of year 3: $2,000

Cash outflow (cost of investment) =$20,000

Step-1 Computation of PV of cash inflows of every year:

PV of year 1 = Cash inflow of year 1 / (1+ interest rate)^ 1

= $10,000 / (1+0.07) ^ 1

= $10,000 X 0.934579

= $9,346

PV of year 2 = Cash inflow of year 1 / (1+ interest rate)^ 2

= $10,000 / (1+0.07) ^ 2

= $10,000 X 0.873438

= $8,735

PV of year 3= Cash inflow of year 1 / (1+ interest rate)^ 3

= $2,000 / (1+0.07) ^ 2

= $2,000 X 0.816297

=$1,633

Step-2 Computation of total amount of PV of cash inflows:

$\rm\ PV \rm\ of \rm\ cash \rm\ inflows = \rm\ PV \rm\ of \rm\ year \rm\ 1 + \rm\ PV \rm\ of \rm\ year \rm\ 2 + \rm\ PV \rm\ of \rm\ year \rm\ 3\\\rm\ PV \rm\ of \rm\ cash \rm\ inflows =\$9,346 + \$8,735 + \$1,633\\\rm\ PV \rm\ of \rm\ cash \rm\ inflows =\$19,714$

Step-3 Computation of NPV:

$\rm\ NPV=\rm\ PV \rm\ of \rm\ cash \rm\ inflows- \rm\ Cost \rm\ of \rm\ investment\\\rm\ NPV=\$19,714-\$20,000\\\rm\ NPV=\$ (286)$

Therefore, the NPV comes out to be a negative amount of 286, and hence, the company should not accept the project.

Learn more about the net present value in the related link:

brainly.com/question/14015430

#SPJ1

5 0

2 years ago