An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, generally referred to by its shortened title The Wealth of Nations, is the magnum opus of the Scottish economist and moral philosopher Adam Smith. First published in 1776, the book offers one of the world's first collected descriptions of what builds nations' wealth, and is today a fundamental work in classical economics. By reflecting upon the economics at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, the book touches upon such broad topics as the division of labour, productivity, and free markets.[1]
We are in need of the statement that were given to you in-order to help you with the correct answer <3
Answer:
C. They wanted to send other nations a stern warning not to interfere in US government.
Answer:
Mansa Musa developed cities like Timbuktu and Gao into important cultural centers. He also brought architects from the Middle East and across Africa to design new buildings for his cities. Mansa Musa turned the kingdom of Mali into a sophisticated center of learning in the Islamic world.
Answer:
1) Peace
2) Do you believe sustained world peace is possible? Why or why not?
Explanation:
There are two valid definitions of the word peace:
<em>Peace is a period in time without any conflicts similar to war. </em>
<em>Peace is the state of freedom that no one disturbs.</em>
<em />
World peace is possible in <u>theory</u>.
To achieve world peace all of the nations would have to relinquish dogma, religion and political beliefs.
Those are the three main reasons why people cannot have peace.
Similar topics are discussed in many Utopian books. Something similar was the main idea of communism at the beginning. In the perfect world without any conflict, everyone would have to live by the same rules, have equal rights and the same lifestyle. Still, there is a problem with this type of life and it lies in the efforts of society and individuals. For example, a person who goes to college would not have a better financial life than the person who did not go to college, thus the individual effort to stand out would be pointless.
<u>To conclude, world peace is possible in theory, but it is almost impossible to have it in practice.</u>
