When property is sold in the middle of year, both the buyer and seller can deduct their pro rated portion of the property tax.
The property taxes are based on the assessed value of the property. So when the property tax is pro rated at the time of the transfer, both the buyer and seller can deduct their pro rated portion of the property tax.
Buyer and seller prorations are often applied during real estate closing transactions to divide the cost of expenses like property taxes. Thus, the buyer gets a deduction for the prorated amount of property tax due after closing, and the seller gets the same deduction for the taxes.
Hence, both the buyer and seller receives the deduction for the real property tax.
To learn more about property tax here:
brainly.com/question/15227817
#SPJ4
Answer:
$16.50
Explanation:
Note: The complete question is attached as picture below
We know that there is a total of 90 units of oil and 30 units is consumed in period 0.
So, in period 1, the consumption amount will be = 90-30=60 units.
So, Q1 = 192 - 8P
For 60 units, the price will be 60 = 192 - 8P
8P = 192 - 60
8P = 132
P = 132 / 8
P = 16.5
So, the price in period 1 is $16.50
Answer:
Hanna is correct.
Explanation:
The sale of the 2004 Dodge cannot be construed to be a sale of goods under the Uniform Commercial Code since this law covers sales of goods by merchants. Hanna cannot be said to be a merchant of 2004 Dodge as she is not known to be in the business for the purchase and sale of cars. Therefore, the case should be adjudicated under the common law. What has taken place in this instance is the exchange of a personal asset. Hanna cannot make a trading profit from the sale, but a capital gain. Rachel is not correct.
Answer:
<u>Opportunity</u>
Explanation:
A code of conduct creates a formal way of how employees maintain a standard of conduct while interacting and discussing ideas.
Such a conduct is essential for any organization since it implements the abidance by rules and organizational policies treating everybody equally and ensuring just and fair treatment to all.
In the given case, an employee observes the existence of a formal code of conduct at her workplace which is not implemented consistently at all levels and covering all employees.
Such negligence in implementation would lead to an enhancement of the possibility and creates an opportunity for employees to commit unscrupulous acts, being aware of the shortcomings in the implementation of such formal code of conduct.
