Answer:
c) -2/5=0.4 d) -5/2=0.4 are incorrect
Answer:
Matt made the error
He used the diameter instead of the radius in step 2
Step-by-step explanation:
Well first we need to change the format of the equations to slope-intercept, or y=mx+b.
So the first one (x + y < 1) will be changed to y < -x + 1.
The second one (2y ≥ x - 4) will be changed to y <span>≥ x/2 - 2.
Now we can analyze each graph.
In every single graph the first equation (y < -x + 1) is graphed correctly.
Now for the second equation, we can see that only the first and last graph correctly format to the equation.
Now for the shading:
The first equation shows us that y is less than -x +1, making the shading go under the dotted line. (to the left)
The second equation shows us that y is greater than or equal to x/2 - 2, making the shading go above the line. (also to the left)
Therefore, when we shade, the overlapping shading is correctly formatted in the first graph.
Hope this helped, comment any questions you have for me.</span>
Because the fraction with the lesser denominator divides the whole into less pieces that are essentially larger then the fraction with a greater denominator who divides the whole into more pieces, but smaller.
A is congruent to X
B is congruent to Z
C is congruent to Y
AB is congruent to XZ
AC is congruent to XY
BC is congruent to ZY
ABC is congruent to XZY
