Answer:
According to Edwin Lemert, <u>secondary</u> deviance occurs when social reaction intensifies with each act of primary deviance, and the offender becomes stigmatized, accepting the truth of the label.
Explanation:
Edwin Lemert in 1951 stated that secondary deviance is the process of a deviant identity, integrating it into conceptions of self, potentially affecting the individual long term.
The motivation to eat is influenced by option 1.) all of these factors.
Motivation to eat comes from both homeostatic and non-homeostatic factors. Homeostatic refers to physical, chemical, and internal conditions of the human body. When the motivation of eating occurs due to signals sent by the brain, it is called homeostatic eating.
Homeostatic eating includes biological factors. On the other hand, non-homeostatic factors include the factors external to the body where eating is done for reasons other than biological. It includes psychological, social, and cultural factors which initiate the motivation to eat. For instance, stress can trigger the motivation to eat.
Learn more about factors influencing food habits here brainly.com/question/16714843
#SPJ4
The type of intelligence that allows you to learn to play your first few notes on a saxophone is called fluid intelligence.
Answer:
The conclusion is false, because it is assuming that correlation = causation.
Explanation:
An important principle in statistical analysis is the principle that when correlation exist between two variables or more, it does not mean that one of the variables are causing the other to appear in a certain manner.
Remember that correlation means that you are investigating whether a relationships exists between two variables; in this example, as we can see, it is between the biodiversity in an ecosystem and the population of an insect.
The graph can be said to illustrate the result of the research; that as the biodiversity of the ecosystem goes down, the insect's population goes up. This is a form of negative correlation.
However - we do not know what is the direction of the relationship; the student concludes that as some insects die within the ecosystem, the researched insect's population goes up; assuming that the predator species died off and thus the researched insect's population increases.
Yet, it is also possible for the relationship to go towards the other direction; the researched insect population increases - perhaps by the introduction of a new food source that causes the species' population to increase - and thus, this damages the biodiversity of the ecosystem, making the population go down since it is possible that the researched insect is instead the species which is on top of the food chain at that ecosystem.
To investigate the direction of a relationship, further research need to be done and more sophisticated statistical methods need to be used.
Answer:
<h2><em>
<u>Yellow Sea</u>, Chinese Huang Hai, Korean Hwanghae, large inlet of the western Pacific Ocean </em><em>separates</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>Korean</em><em> </em><em>peninsula</em><em> </em><em>from</em><em> </em><em>mainland</em><em> </em><em>China</em></h2>
