Null hypothesis: There is no significant association between the existing process and the new process for reducing the population proportion of screens that will be rejected
.
Alternative hypothesis :There is a significant association between the existing process and the new process for reducing the population proportion of screens that will be rejected
.
Finally the null hypothesis will be rejected and we should accept the alternate hypothesis
Step-by-step explanation:
In the existing process the sample size and population was not known.,but the percentage of rejected screens were given as 12%.,but in the new process out of 100 screens only 6 are rejected
percentage of rejected screens using new process = 6÷ 100 ×100 = 6%
percentage of rejected screens using existing (old) process = 12%
so the new process is the effective one which reduces the rejection rate of screens., hence it is concluded that There is a significant association between the existing process and the new process for reducing the population proportion of screens that will be rejected
.
so the null hypothesis will be rejected and we should accept the alternate hypothesis
Answer:
y=1/2x-4
Step-by-step explanation:
y-y1=m(x-x1)
y+3=1/2(x-2)
y+3=1/2x-1
y=1/2x-4
Answer:
225 cm^3
Step-by-step explanation:
L = length
W = width
H = height
Equation: LWH + LWH
= (15)(3)(3) + (10)(3)(3)
= 135 + 90
= 225
Check the picture below.
two twin sides stemming from a common corner will produce twin angles on the other end, which is what happens on any isosceles triangle, twin sides making twin angles at the base.