I would argue that the scientific method wasn't very revolutionary during the scientific revolution seeing as it existed for hundreds of years. i think it was one of the ancient Greek or roman philosophers that first developed a series of thought that closely resembles the scientific method we know today. however another interpretation of the question is in the definition of revolution. the scientific revolution wasn't bloody like the British/french/american revolution. however the " dictionary definition" of revolution is completing an orbit. in that sense you could consider the scientific revolution a misnomer. in conclusion i think that the ways in which the scientific revolution differed from other revolts are numerous.
Option C. McDonald vs Chicago
<h3>Hope This Helps</h3>
Answer:
During the Vietnam War the U.S military used the television and photographs as propaganda in order to persuade the people that the war was nothing but a war and the military needed public support to get through it.
Well they were effected in many ways. some had to live without fathers and some even had there homes destroyed but most important of all is that they all had FREEDOM
I think it’s c but I could be wrong
