Edit images.
(have to spam so i ahve enough words)
apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple
Answer:
i) The time taken for 1500 records = 15 seconds.
ii) The time taken for 1500 records = 50 seconds.
Explanation:
A is an O(n) algorithm.
An algorithm with O(n) efficiency is described as a linearly increasing algorithm, this mean that the rate at which the input increases is linear to the time needed to compute that algorithm with n inputs.
From the question, it is given that for 1000 records, the time required is: 10 seconds.
Algorithm time taken is O(n)
Hence,
1) For 1,500 records
=> 10/1000 = x/1500
=> 10x1500/1000 = x
x = 15 seconds
Thus, the time taken for 1500 records = 15 seconds.
2) For 5,000 records
=> 10/1000 = x/5000
=> 10x5000/1000 = x
x = 50 seconds
Thus, the time taken for 1500 records = 50 seconds.
Answer:
blueprint.
Explanation:
Generally Accepted Principles and Practices for Securing Information Technology Systems, provides best practices and security principles that can direct the security team in the development of a security blueprint.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be "Taxonomy
".
Explanation:
A location taxonomy seems to be the direction it helped organize the information into subgroups as well as subsections, often shown in a network map, in comparison to internet sites and access points.
- Is a very well-planned approach that implies that somehow the navigation features on the website become straightforward to do this and feature-packed
- The scientific method of categorizing, or classifying, items predicated on a default framework.
Answer:
The answer is YES.
Explanation:
<em>Things pertaining to weapons, destructive materials should be shared with precautions or much better if these things should not be put online. Since internet is widely available to almost all types of users and almost to all places, we cannot be sure of who will get hold of these information. Kids could easily see this and gain knowledge and out of curiosity will try these dangerous things. Terrorist groups will also have access to these information and who knows might happen to poor innocent souls around. </em>
<em>
</em>
<em>I don't think it would violate the right of First Amendment regarding freedom of speech. Freedom should be granted on matters that are most sensible. And this time, we are just protecting the rights of children and other innocent people who can be a victim including you. We are talking about weapons and destructive materials here which is non beneficial if one could get hold of this information, in my opinion. If there is really a need to construct these things, it is better to consult an expert or an authority to ensure that nobody gets harm.</em>
