Post hoc: fallacy in logic that assumes a cause-and-effect relationship because of sequence.
<em>Post hoc </em>is a fallacy since it implies that one event is the consequence of a previous event just because it comes later. Usually, if one event is after another, it does not mean one event is the cause or consequence of another just because they are correlative in time.
Inferences: reasoning from several particular examples to establish a general principle.
<em>Inference </em>means reaching a conclusion based on evidence.
Inductive reasoning: drawing conclusions from implied information.
<em>Inductive reasoning </em>uses data or information given to reach a general conclusion. it goes from specific to general.
Deductive reasoning: drawing a particular conclusion from general premises.
<em>Deductive reasoning</em> approach is based on a general statement or theory in order to reach a logical conclusion.
Answer:
hope it helps if not comment so that I can re-do it good day.
Answer:
We were crushed by the hammer of sunlight. What is being compared? Metaphor; Sunlight to a hammer (without using the words LIKE or AS). Simile; fear is being compared to armor using the word LIKE.
Explanation:
hope this helps
Boxing cannot be played by her.