Answer:
The first thought the colleagues had was how they could benefit from the empty position.
Explanation:
The colleagues were together in a room when the discussion was interrupted to announce Ivan's death and the thought the colleagues had was about the changes that could happen among them and the benefits.
Answer:
I would say to use all the parties involved to shape their experience from a different perspective. The way you shape your perspective can have a big impact on how your reader sees your all-inclusive and overall plot. The author should take part as one of the characters and you should show WHAT happened and you need to establish your perspective uniquely. A key thing is that you want your reader to take away from what you are writing, and the tone of voice you are using. Also for the problem, why was it a problem? Who helped solve or help the problem? If there is a solution, then explain that in detail, and since it is a personal narrative, how do you feel overall from the problem or conflict? I HOPE THIS HELPS, PLEASE CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG!
Answer:
1. man vs self
2. man vs man
3. man vs self
4. man vs technology
5. man vs self - correction
6. man vs nature
Explanation:
In hard sci-fi, the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki is viewed as a destructive event and is denoted as option A.
<h3>What is Bombing?</h3>
This involves the use of an explosive device which is referred to as bomb which is characterized by sudden and violent release of energy.
The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki claimed millions of Japanese lives which makes it a destructive event.
Read more about Hiroshima bombing here brainly.com/question/987065
#SPJ4
