The most common method to measure flows of trade is the comparison between the exportation of merchandise, services, and the capital of the countries.
<h3>What is trade?</h3>
Trade is the situation where the countries buy (import) from or sell (export) to the countries outside the boundaries of their own territories.
Exports referred to the scenario where one country provides goods and services to another country abroad. The comparison of goods, services, and monetary capital of foreign countries with respect to their own countries can be used as a common method to measure the trade flows.
Therefore, the exporting of goods, services, and capital to other countries is the method to determine trade flows.
Learn more about the trade from the related link:
brainly.com/question/3617318
#SPJ4
Answer:
Consider the following explanation
Explanation:
Context
Game theory involves two players. They have more than one option to decide. Pay off from each options adopted by two players are available. They have to select a strategy which will maximize their own return. But for optimizing their decision, they have to consider the action of his rival.
In this problem, two players are firm A and firm B. They have two strategies low output and high output. The strategies of firm a are measured in rows and for firm B in columns. They have to select a strategy which will maximize their payy off. Each cell has two pay offs. First one is for Firm A and second one is for firm B.
1. Dominant strategy is a strategy which will always give higher payoffs in comparison with pay off of other strategies. Consider first strategy of firm 1. If it adopts strategy of low output, then firm 2 can also adopt either strategy of low output or high output. In that case pay off of firm 1 will be 300 or 200.
Alteratively if firm 1 adopts high output then pay offs are 200 or 75. 200 is earned if firm B also go for low productivity. It is 75 if firm B adopts high productivity.
Now compare two payoffs side by side. Note that firm A has higher pay off in low output [300,200] in comparison with the pay off of high output [200,75]. So whatever strategy firm B adopts, Firm A will always go for low production. So low production strategy of firm A dominates high production strategy.
Same result is not observed for firm B. Pay off from low production strategy of firm B is [ 250,75]. Pay off from high production strategy are [100,100]. Now compare the two. If Firm A go for low production, then firm B will select low production. It will give pay off 250. Similarly when firm A decides for high production, then firm will also decide for high production. It will maximize its pay off. Amount is 100. Thus no strategy dominates for firm B.
Answer:
A. any distractions that reduce the effectiveness of the communication process
Explanation:
Noise is the disturbance occurs between the sender and the receiver or the sender and the audience through which the distractions of the persons could occur
With the presence of the noise, it is very difficult to communicate with someone as there is a chance of miscommunications that reflects the reduction in the effectiveness of the communication process. It can be in terms of the sound of the machine, a mental disturbance, etc
Answer:
The balance in Salaries and Wages Payable at December 31, 2019 is $1,840
Explanation:
The computation of the balance in salaries and wages payable is shown below:
= Salaries and wages payable on January 31, 2020 - salaries and wages expense + salaries paid in January month
= $1,140 - $2,140 + $2,840
= $1,840
The other information which is given in the question is not relevant. So, it is not considered in the computation part.
Answer:
1) B
2) A
3) D
Explanation:
1) Discount yield(%) = Face value - Purchase value/Face value X 360/Maturity ( in days) X 100%
Discount yield (quote) = 5.11; Face value = $10,000; Let Purchase value = x; Maturity = 90 days
(5.11)% = $(10,000 - x)/$10,000 X 360/90 X 100%
5.11 = 400(10,000 - x)/10,000
x = 4,000,000 - 51100/400 = 3,948,900 = $9,872.25
3) Face value = $10,000; Purchase value = $9,850; Maturity = 120 days
Investor's bond equivalent yield(%) = $(10,000 - 9,850)10,000 X 360/120 X 100%
= 45/10 = 4.5%
