Which of the following is an example of inverse operations?

Mathematics

1 answer:

MatroZZZ [7]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

because your finding 3 cubed then finding the opposite, cubed root

You might be interested in

Help me with this one plz

Zina [86]

C is your answer! If you take away the 25.5 from 60 and divide that my 2 your answer is 17.25!

7 0

3 years ago

The diameter of a cylindrical construction pipe is 6 ft. If the pipe is 26 ft long, what is its volume?

Mandarinka [93]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

First find the area of the circular base. The diameter is 6, so the radius is 3.

A circle is pi r square, so it is 3.14 x 3^2, = 28.26

Multiply that by the length 28.26 x 26 = 734.76, which rounds to 735 cubic feet.

5 0

3 years ago

Given a function <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=f%28x%29%3D3x%5E4-5x%5E2%2B2x-3" id="TexFormula1" title="f(x)=3x^4-5x^2+2x-3"

Levart [38]

Answer:

$\huge\boxed{f(-1) = -7}$

Step-by-step explanation:

In order to solve for this function, we need to substitute in our value of x inside to find f(x). Since we are trying to evalue f(-1), we will substitute -1 in as x to our equation.

$f(-1) = 3(-1)^4 - 5(-1)^2 + 2(-1) - 3$

Now we can solve for the function by multiplying/subtracting/adding our known values.

Starting with the first term to the last term:

$3(-1)^4 = 3$

WAIT! How is this possible? $-1^4 = -1$ (according to my calculator), and $3 \cdot -1 = -3$ , not 3!

It's important to note that taking a power of a negative number and multiplying a negative number are two different things. Let's use $-2^2$ as an example.

What your calculator did was follow BEMDAS since it wasn't explicitly told not to.

BEMDAS:

- Brackets

- Exponents

- Multiplication/Division

- Addition/Subtraction

Examining the equation, your calculator used this rule properly. Note that exponents come over multiplication.

So rather than being "-2 squared" - it's "the negative of of 2 squared."

Tying this back into our problem, the squared method would only be true if it looks like $-1^4$ . However, since we're substituting in -1, it looks like $(-1)^4$ , so the expression reads out as "-1 to the fourth."