1492 is the correct answer.
Well, both countries contained ancient civilizations, Egypt being the Egyptians and Nile River Valley, and India being the Indus River Valley civilization. Also, the people of both regions had specific religious beliefs like in Egypt, they believed in, well, Egyptian gods and goddess and in India, at the time it might have been anywhere from indigenous beliefs, to Islam, to Hinduism. Both regions made important technology civilizations that impact us even today. Both regions were a culture hearth and at their peak, they thrived and prospered immensely.
The plan of USSR was:
TO divide Germany to prevent it from waging war again.
Explanation:
The policy of the USSR was to divide Germany into pieces so that it would never wage wars again. Obviously, that was only the surface reasons given by the soviets.
The true reason was rather self serving.
- The part of the East that Russia eventually got was to serve as the buffer for their territory and Europe.
- They had a foothold in mainland Europe.
- The state was Russian in all but name. They had complete control.
These were the reasons that made Russia come to the conclusion it did.
Answer:
My opinion is that it is fair that the Jewish People have a place to claim as their own, that is also their ancestral land, since they have been an errand people since the times of the Roman Empire, who have been expelled from many countries, and who have been subject to discrimination and poor treament.
However, it would also be fair that the Palestian Arabs have a share of the land too, because they were dwelling those land for more than a millenium before the Jewish began to settle back. This is why the most reasonable policy for the area would be a two state solution: one state for the Jewish People, and one state for the Palestinian Arabs.
Remembering Tiananmen in Hong Kong has been viewed as an act of defiance for years, and it has become even more so now that the city’s own democratic future has come under threat. In the run-up to the 30th anniversary, demonstrators marched through the semi-autonomous enclave’s financial district chanting, “justice will prevail” and toting “support freedom” umbrellas. “In China, [people] can’t say anything against the government,” says Au Wai Sze, a nurse in Hong Kong who marched along with her 15-year-old daughter. “So while we in Hong Kong can still speak [out], we must represent the voice of the Chinese people and remind the world of this injustice.” Remembering Tiananmen in Hong Kong has been viewed as an act of defiance for years, and it has become even more so now that the city’s own democratic future has come under threat. In the run-up to the 30th anniversary, demonstrators marched through the semi-autonomous enclave’s financial district chanting, “justice will prevail” and toting “support freedom” umbrellas. “In China, [people] can’t say anything against the government,” says Au Wai Sze, a nurse in Hong Kong who marched along with her 15-year-old daughter. “So while we in Hong Kong can still speak [out], we must represent the voice of the Chinese people and remind the world of this injustice.”
For all its power, China’s government is still deeply paranoid. Today, the regime is “stronger on the surface than at any time since the height of Mao’s power, but also more brittle,” Andrew Nathan, a professor of political science at Columbia University, wrote in Foreign Affairs. The people’s loyalty is predicated on wealth accumulation, which will be difficult to sustain. A sputtering economy, widespread environmental pollution, rampant corruption and soaring inequality have all fed public anxieties about Xi’s ability to continue fulfilling the prosperity-for-loyalty bargain.
