Answer:yes
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: Phillip is correct. The triangles are <u>not </u>congruent.
How do we know this? Because triangle ABC has the 15 inch side between the two angles 50 and 60 degrees. The other triangle must have the same set up (just with different letters XYZ). This isn't the case. The 15 inch side for triangle XYZ is between the 50 and 70 degree angle.
This mismatch means we cannot use the "S" in the ASA or AAS simply because we don't have a proper corresponding pair of sides. If we knew AB, BC, XZ or YZ, then we might be able to use ASA or AAS.
At this point, there isn't enough information. So that means John and Mary are incorrect, leaving Phillip to be correct by default.
Note: Phillip may be wrong and the triangles could be congruent, but again, we don't have enough info. If there was an answer choice simply saying "there isn't enough info to say either if the triangles are congruent or not", then this would be the best answer. Unfortunately, it looks like this answer is missing. So what I bolded above is the next best thing.
Answer: 500 calories
Set them as proportions
375/46=x/60
Multiply 60 to each side to eliminate fraction
Then you’ll get x=500
f(x) being even means
f(x) = f(-x)
So the zeros come in positive and negative pairs. If there are an odd number of intercepts like there are here, it's because one of them is x=0 which is its own negation.
Given zero x=6 we know x=-6 is also a zero.
So we know three zeros, and know the other two zeros are a positive and negative pair.
The only choice with (-6,0) and (0,0) is A.
Choice A
Consecutive integers = in this situation double-digit whole numbers
So as there are 3 of them let's say 2 are 11 because that would be the highest consecutive number so 11+11= 22 and 48-22=26 so the three have the ages of 11,11,26 and the oldest would be 26 ;)
