Answer:
The Electoral College system has led to controversy. In both the election of 2000 and the election of 2016, one candidate won the popular vote, but the other candidate won the Electoral College and therefore the presidency. Critics charge that in this system, a small group of representatives decides the presidency, rather than the entire population of the United States, and that states with smaller populations have a disproportionate say in who becomes president.
Explanation:
The Articles of Confederation required all thirteen states to agree to an amendment in order to make any changes. Article V of the Constitution requires two-thirds of Congress or state legislatures to propose an amendment, and three-quarters of the states to ratify it. That's still tough, but it's not impossible like it was under the Articles!
Answer:
Your individual rights guarantee individuals rights to certain freedoms without interference from the government or other individuals. ... Since the United States is a democracy, the rights and equality of each individual in society are of the utmost importance—in theory and in practice. The human rights discourse is accepted by practically every government. A state can hardly portray itself openly as a violator of human rights. But how do we turn this discourse into public policy? We propose using the tools developed by New Public Management and applying them to the public policy cycle, which can be given additional substance by unpacking the obligations, essential elements, and cross-cutting principles of human rights.
Explanation:
https://sur.conectas.org/en/public-policies-human-rights-perspective/
Answer:
Reasons why chiefs signed the treaty included wanting controls on sales of Māori land to Europeans, and on European settlers. They also wanted to trade with Europeans, and believed the new relationship with Britain would stop fighting between tribes
Hope this helps! have a wonderful day!!!
Plato, Socrates, Thales, Aristotle, Gorgias, Pythagoras, Thucydides
