Answer:
B
Explanation:
Real GDP measure total economic output by an economy in a specific geographical boundary regardless of ownership of factors of production, within a year, ceteris paribus.
Real GDP is a good indicator but is not a perfect indicator as underground economy (private tuition whereby taxes and consumption of goods and services) are not accounted for.
Real GDP does not measure Non-Material standard of living like leisure hours, health and life expectancy... It needs other indicators.
Both B and D is a bit effy as:
For D, GDP does not even measure such Non-Material SOL
For B, GDP is not 100 percent accurate on measuring household production (local production? I believe there is no such phrasing as household production as by economics, household is involved in household spending, Contributing to Consumption expenditure in Aggregate Demand.) as there are other factors like presence of underground economy that is not accounted for.
However, B seems like the most accurate ans as it still measures national output.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Have you ever heard the phrase "there are lies, [email protected] lies and statistics"?
The only way that a statistical study be 100% confident is that it involves everyone or everything. For example, if you want to carry on a study about how many US college students drive, in order to be 100% confident of the result, you would need to interview all the college students in the country.
Answer:
positively.
Explanation:
The <u><em>correlation </em></u>between education and income is positive a more educated person will always have a better income than one that is not. But along the statistical distribution of this<u><em> correlation</em></u> there are people that <u><em>deviate </em></u>for the curve <u><em>(standar deviation)</em></u> and even though they are educated they do not earn as much money to others that have the same level of education.
Answer:
a. What is the expected return of the risky corporate bond over the 5-year holding-period (in %)?
expected return in $ = (50% x 20% x $1,000 x 4) + (50% x 35% x $1,000 x 4) = $400 + $700 = $1,100
holding period return = ($1,100 - $1,000) / $1,000 = 10%
b. What is its effective annual return?
(1 + 10%)⁰°² - 1 = 1.92%
b. What is its effective annual return?
- 2. The government bond is the superior investment
The yield of he corporate bond is very low and the risk is too high.
Answer:
C.multiply number of shares outstanding by the price of each share
