Answer:
While African resistance to European colonialism is often thought of in terms of a white and black/European and African power struggle, this presumption underestimates the complex and strategic thinking that Africans commonly employed to address the challenges of European colonial rule. It also neglects the colonial-era power dynamic of which African societies and institutions were essential components.
After the Berlin Conference of 1884–85, at which the most powerful European countries agreed upon rules for laying claim to particular African territories, the British, French, Germans, Italians, Spanish, Belgians, and Portuguese set about formally implementing strategies for the long-term occupation and control of Africa. The conquest had begun decades earlier—and in the case of Angola and South Africa, centuries earlier. But after the Berlin Conference it became more systematic and overt.
The success of the European conquest and the nature of African resistance must be seen in light of Western Europe's long history of colonial rule and economic exploitation around the world. In fact, by 1885 Western Europeans had mastered the art of divide, conquer, and rule, honing their skills over four hundred years of imperialism and exploitation in the Americas, Asia, and the Pacific. In addition, the centuries of extremely violent, protracted warfare among themselves, combined with the technological advances of the Industrial Revolution, produced unmatched military might. When, rather late in the period of European colonial expansion, Europeans turned to Africa to satisfy their greed for resources, prestige, and empire, they quickly worked their way into African societies to gain allies and proxies, and to co-opt the conquered kings and chiefs, all to further their exploits. Consequently, the African responses to this process, particularly the ways in which they resisted it, were complex.
The desert fathers did not flee from fellowship
They protected the Western & Atlantic railroad which was confederate general Joseph E. Johnston’s supply link to Atlanta
Answer:
Harran Derrick was a Rancher and he believed that the railroad was cheating him by always passing the point of destination for his goods and him having to pay extra money to get the goods to the final destination.
He also believed that the railroads were taking the land that he spent time to cultivate and using it for their construction purposes which was allowed due to the importance of the development of more rail roads and the rail system in general.
Answer:
C) The Texas Bill of rights protects individual freedoms from being infringed upon by the government.
Explanation:
The Texas Bill of Rights has more positive tone, and it leverages the citizens with much the same level of protections like the US bill of Rights. However, you will find that Texas bill of right goes beyond the federal protection. And as an example, the section 3a, has been written to not allow the discrimination which is on the basis of the color, creed, race, gender or nationality. And hence, it protects the individual freedoms from being invaded by the government. However, it can be ammended, and federalism is embodied in the Texas bill of rights.
