The factor that led to shifts in the supreme court decisions over time is that
- The ideological composition of the justices on the Supreme Court shifted to become less liberal over time.
<h3>
How the supreme court Justices became less liberal</h3>
The supreme court justices became less liberal due to the fact that a lot of these judges were conservatives.
The conservative judges were the ones that were in favor of keeping the ideals and the traditions that the country was built on.
<u>complete question:</u>
Which of the following factors most likely led to shifts in Supreme Court decision making over time?
The ideological composition of the justices on the Supreme Court shifted to become less liberal over time.
After 1960, the Supreme Court deferred to the wishes of state and local governments rather than voting to expand the authority of the federal government.
Rather than pass new legislation, Congress was inclined to refer civil rights legislation to the Supreme Court.
Constitutional amendments enabled the Supreme Court to issue more liberal decisions.
The ideological composition of the justices on the Supreme Court shifted to become less liberal over
Read more on conservatives here:brainly.com/question/8668324
<span>The four spatial zones identified by the cultural anthropologist Edward Hall that can affect communication are intimate, personal, social and public. The intimate zone is within touching distance, the social zone four to twelve feet apart, the personal zone is two to four feet apart, with the public zone being more than twelve feet,</span>
Answer:
A) cognitive dissonance
Explanation:
Mrs. Jonas believes strongly that it is important that workers' rights be respected, and that one of the more important ways of doing this is to ensure that all workers be properly documented. She is supervising a contracting company that is building a new warehouse for her company. While doing this she discovers that many of the workers employed by the contractor are undocumented aliens working for well below minimum wage.
Mrs. Jonas is likely experiencing cognitive dissonance. She is experiencing cognitive dissonance, any incompatibility an individual might perceive between two or more attitudes or between behavior and attitudes.In cognitive dissonance , a person who is in a situation to experience contradictory belief, attitudes or ideas
The statement that [The "relationship" topics within team ground rules, such as "discuss openly and protect confidentiality" and "avoid misunderstandings", should eliminate the need for the team to address how to handle conflict] is TRUE.
This is true because rules such as [discuss openly and protect confidentiality] and [avoid misunderstandings] would already solve the problem or conflict before it escalates, thus eliminating the need for the to address it.
They could tell the slaves to do labor for them and could whip them if they were being disobedient, unfair things like that. <span />
