Answer:
What arguments could be made for removing the dictator?
Arguments for removing the dictator are: allowing the country to establish a democracy. Helping out or improving the situation of those demographic groups that were oppressed by the dictator. Another argument is simply punishing the dictator for his crimes.
What arguments could be made for keeping the dictator in power?
The main argument for keeping the dictator is to ensure the stability of the country, even if such stability is unfair at many times, and comes along with the oppresion of certain social and political groups.
Another argument is simply to prevent the country from getting worse.
A final argument is pragmatic: keeping the dictator in power might serve everyone's interests better. Democratic countries have frequently established ties with authoritarian governments.
The main point of this excerpt is that African-Americans were not considered US citizens.
In the Supreme Court case Dred Scott vs. Sandford, Scott is suing for his freedom from slavery. This is because his master brought him to the Wisconsin territory, a territory where slavery was outlawed.
However, the Supreme Court ruled against him. The reason why they ruled against him is based on the excerpt above. The Declaration of Independence did not make it blatantly clear that slaves were considered citizens. Since they were not considered citizens, they had no legal rights that slave owners had to respect.
It would be "<span>Slavery was an established institution until the Twelfth Amendment was ratified on December 18, 1865" that is not true, since it was in fact the 13th amendment that ended slavery. </span>
The Petition of Right reinforces the Magna Carta.
The Petition of Right was made to restate the legitimacy of the Magna Carta. Parliament used it because the King had been going against Magna Carta by gathering forced loans.
Answer:
the answer is:
O a religious movement to reform the Catholic Church that resulted in new
Christian denominations